| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | -8458 | 6440 | 13972 | 85018 | 44929 | 25064 | 183881 |
| 2021 | 98674 | 42302 | 13538 | 17940 | 20853 | 18020 | 211327 |
| 2022 | 93495 | 48874 | 9535 | 5778 | 15729 | 19706 | 193117 |
| 2023 | 11071 | 5508 | 8336 | 9807 | 11777 | 10713 | 57212 |
| 2024 | 15181 (+7) | 10249 (+3) | 1043 (+11) | 5222 (+12) | 7799 | 10359 | 49853 |
| 2025 | 18596 (+312) | 21902 (+764) | 12008 (+939) | 3135 (+2405) | 5407 | 1295 | 62343 |

Below, a post from another thread refutes the false claim that Trump is urging the public, "Let Ukraine fight back." He never said that. I believe Trump's remark is evidence that he remained Commander in Chief throughout Biden's regime.
When I researched the types of weapons and aircraft given whenever Biden handed Ukraine equipment, I always found obsolete or otherwise limited arms. The aircraft we gave was several manufacturing generations old, retrofitted as much as possible (confirmed by a FReeper who used to work in aircraft repair). The US gave Ukraine HIMAR missiles, but often purchased old Soviet era rocket launchers for them.
The Deep STate wanted nukes, and instead they received defensive level arms. Trump didn't want us in the war NATO tried to start. WIthout President Trump serving as CINC during the Biden regime, the world would be entirely different at this point.
I have always wondered if the limit of 'defensive arms only' was given to Putin in advance. Putin was fighting the USA and the combined forces of NATO, and obviously knew what kind of conventional weapons the US possessed. But Putin was remarkably restrained; he doesn't want war, but he was being threatened with country-ending arms given Biden was bankrolling most of the fighting per their NATO plan.
I'm curious about Trump's reasons for remarking on Biden's 'odd' decision now. The left is eagerly casting his remarks as pro-Ukraine war rhetoric by falsely implying Trump said, "Let Ukraine FIght." At first blush, Trump's actual critique of Biden's choice of defensive weapons can kneecap the left's position that Ukraine was winning until Trump took office, and their claims that Trump is responsible for Ukraine's loss to Russia. Maybe that is sufficient explaination.
But I also wonder if it is meant to cause the public to wonder WHY Biden only gave defensive arms, particularly when our own Congress critters waved pro Ukraine flags in chambers. The Dems keep warning us Putin wants to take over the world and freedom itself is on trial in Ukraine. Well if it was such a big deal, then why only give Ukraine defensive weapons?
So perhaps Trump's statement moves us an inch closer to exposing the Biden regime, and the legally documented need for President Trump to remain Commander in Chief during the Biden regime.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Trump Warns 'Interesting Times Ahead': Let Ukraine 'Fight Back', ransomnote wrote: FAKE NEWS.
Trump did not say, "Let Ukraine fight back."
Trump commented that Biden permitted defensive weapons only, and noted that this was unusual if the point was to help Ukraine win.I checked AI, and it at first affirmed Trump said it, then the AI explained that Trump actually criticized Biden. Then the AI said Trump never explicitly said that.
The sources the AI used for it's 'proof' were almost all lefty pro-Ukrainian war sources.
Sharp drop 2023-2025, way down from the previous years.