“”The new reality is not strictly anti-Semitism or anti-Americanism or pro-Russian bias, but a judgment of the world according to a new paradigm.””
A new paradigm? Please explain what you mean by that, and if it’s what I think you mean, how it is “new”.
Carlson was brought up in a religious family (grandfather was a priest, Episcopalian). So how would his judgment of the world be “new”. I don’t know about any differences re: the Episcopal faith, but I can’t imagine it being all that different that Carlson would have to have a “religious conversion” to see the world as it really is. So please elaborate.
It sounds like you’re giving Carlson a huge benefit of the doubt here, and that is the very definition of a Christian attitude. Congrats on that. But I still don’t trust him. Can’t pin it down, but something just doesn’t seem ‘right’ to me with him.
As to observations about Carlson's Episcopalian upbringing, I refer to his own comments to the effect that the Anglican church meant to him something much less than muscular Christian faith.
If, repeat if, he had a conversion experience, one would assume some sort of departure from his earlier Episcopalian/Anglican exposure.
He would see the world then as one who experienced an epiphany sees the world, according to a new paradigm.
