The amusing part of the “white nationalist” movement is the internal contradictions.
Most folks in 2025 in the US are a mixture of all kinds of ethnic backgrounds and even “races”.
So the first and obvious question is what qualifies as “white” and what percent of “purity” is required?
If someone is—say Nick Fuentes—half Mexican—does that count as white?
Are they going to require DNA tests of all residents with a list of what ethnic groups are OK and what are not, what percent of “whiteness” is OK and what is not?
Most folks in 2025 in the US are a mixture of all kinds of ethnic backgrounds and even “races”.
So the first and obvious question is what qualifies as “white” and what percent of “purity” is required?
That's both true and irrelevant.
There's disagreement among Jews as to who qualifies as Jewish. And most American blacks have a certain amount of European ancestry. Yet no one questions their right to define themselves however they wish, even if their self definitions might seem contradictory or "amusing" to outsiders.
All identities -- racial, ethnic, religious, or even political -- invite disputes among members as to who qualifies. That's why groups split off into factions, denominations, competing organizations, etc.
But subjectivity doesn't mean identities don't exist.
Who cares? It might be silly, but it's their business, not ours.
If their rights to property and freedom of association are protected, then our rights are also safer.
I'd love to see a "Conservative only" town.