Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
"I think it is a bad idea for the country for President Trump or his administration to try to undermine the very decision that confirmed presidential immunity."

Well, I'm not a lawyer or nothing but I think the difference between the two situations is the case against Trump was a pile of hooey, and that against Obama and his crew, from what we read, is a real and a factual case of treason....seemingly so anyway.

If something isn't done to stop the political tomfoolery the rat-crats will continue to do their thing until all of DC is in the toilet. Well, it might be too late to prevent that but maybe we can salvage something. (?)

39 posted on 07/25/2025 5:36:46 AM PDT by unread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: unread
Well, I'm not a lawyer or nothing but I think the difference between the two situations is the case against Trump was a pile of hooey, and that against Obama and his crew, from what we read, is a real and a factual case of treason....seemingly so anyway.

You may well be right about that, but it won't matter in terms of the immunity argument. That argument depends on the nature of the actions, not whether they were justified or done in good faith. Obama would have an even stronger immunity argument than did Trump.

But Clapper and the rest of them don't get immunity, so if the evidence is there, you could go after all of them. Though I don't think it constitutes "treason", there may be some other crime that fits better.

40 posted on 07/25/2025 5:50:47 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson