Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Reily

No.

And that’s why CBS was losing $40 million a year or more on it annually.

Stewart, you want him back on, YOU pay for it.

Because CBS/Paramount Global was likely getting taxpayer funded subsidies to make up for the loss.


36 posted on 07/22/2025 6:53:18 AM PDT by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: mewzilla
Because CBS/Paramount Global was likely getting taxpayer funded subsidies to make up for the loss.

Bingo. There are suspicions that Paramount Global/CBS was getting "under the table" payments to "paper over" the US$40 million per year loss. How? By having USAID send money to an offshore NGO and the NGO sending back money through a back channel back to Paramount/CBS. Essentially, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert was subsidized from what amounts to a slush fund.

74 posted on 07/23/2025 8:26:41 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (.FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson