It was not treason. Treason is a specific crime that is defined in the Constitution. What they say happened does not meet that criteria.
It is more likely conspiracy and sedition.
It’s still bad, but it’s to treason. And it’s not likely anyone will be charged, tried, or convicted. And Obama would likely have immunity from his position as President.
Expose it. And move on.
I am not troubled with the colloquial use of the term to describe the Obama conspiracies (plural). Note that the crime of “purse snatching” might not exist in a give jurisdiction. Will you insist that reports only use the term “larceny” as it might appear in the charging document?
Bump - thank you.
If they go for “treason” or “sedition” - having to with enemies or force - it’ll either be defeated outright or fought endlessly on definitions.
They can be ruined in so many ways - RICO, conspiracy, denial of civil rights, election laws etc. Also tied up and bankrupted by lots of civil law suits.
Don’t waste time/energy/money on defining treason or sedition.
No
I say throw the book at them on every charge that even remotely applies.
We have to fight fire with fire, or we will lose.
If there’s clear, admissible evidence that Obama knowingly conspired to undermine the incoming Trump administration—through false claims or manipulation of intelligence—then he could be prosecuted.
Presidential immunity ends after leaving office, and no one is above the law. Official acts aren’t protected if they involve criminal conspiracy, fraud, or obstruction. Prosecuting a former president would be unprecedented and politically explosive, but it’s legally possible if the evidence is strong enough.
The most likely prosecutable offense—if sufficient evidence exists—would be conspiracy to defraud the U.S. under § 371, especially if officials collaborated to fabricate or promote false narratives to interfere with lawful government processes.
It’s seditious conspiracy and there’s Code for that...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384
Expose it.
Charge it.
Get convictions.
Incarcerate the perps and lose the keys.
“It is more likely conspiracy and sedition.”
In the very least we have a huge criminal RICO charge. HUGE!!
“Move on”? Thanks for “exposing” yourself as one of the “Republicans” who are best described: “Why won’t Republicans fight? Because there is no fight in them”.
It took an ex-Democrat, and a female at that, to demonstrate she had the cojones that 90% of the GOP lacks to fight the lawless ‘Rats who are attempting to overthrow our Republic.
Wear your chains lightly. Depart from us.
By their actions Obama and his gang of traitorous Demonicrats gave aid and comfort to the domestic and foreign enemies of the United States. That is one of the constitutional definitionis of treason.
it’s to treason. And it’s not likely anyone will be charged, tried, or convicted. And Obama would likely have immunity from his position as President.
Expose it. And move on
/
You remind me of the band on the Titanic.
Everything you said is lefty wishful thinking and narrative.
How many post reward doughnuts did the narrative control cubicle pay you for that post ?
Or are you just a volunteer ?
/-)
Correct - except about no one being charged, tried and convicted. Obama won’t be, but no one else enjoys the protections that he does. There is plenty of evidence out there to convict them, and there NEEDS to be some actual accountability and punishment in order to deter such actions in the future.
Presidential immunity would not apply because falsifying intelligence documents is not an official act.
-PJ