Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford
Suppose winning were defined to be, a Ukraine, at least a part of which remains geographically intact, sovereign, and free to make security alliances as it pleases.

Would you then concede that for Ukraine to win would be desirable?


Um, no.

I would extend to Russia the same courtesy we demand here in the US re: the Monroe Doctrine.

(IOW, if it was bad for Russia to put missiles in Cuba and JFK was correct in stopping them, then it's bad for the Ukraine to get in a security alliance with NATO where NATO can put arms close to Russia.)

61 posted on 07/14/2025 7:52:08 AM PDT by Captain Walker ("Justice exalteth a nation: but sin maketh nations miserable." – Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Captain Walker

“”””I would extend to Russia the same courtesy we demand here in the US re: the Monroe Doctrine.
(IOW, if it was bad for Russia to put missiles in Cuba and JFK was correct in stopping them, then it’s bad for the Ukraine to get in a security alliance with NATO where NATO can put arms close to Russia.)””””

Idiotic that you don’t know the difference between keeping European empires and wars out of this part of the world, the least violent and warlike, versus trying to prevent the horrors of the European World Wars in Europe and the conquest of the world by communism.


74 posted on 07/14/2025 10:13:48 AM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson