Posted on 07/13/2025 7:05:50 AM PDT by old school
The Epstein cover-up is not about protecting powerful pedophiles. (Video)
(Excerpt) Read more at rumble.com ...
Trump's mistake was criticizing conservative Epstein case critics in a flash of annoyance rather than coming out with some kind of unity message indicating that the investigations that can be worked on are still ongoing and can't be discussed at this time.
Correct answer.
No drama was needed.
The administration is creating their own mess.
For 15+ years it has been known that Epstein is not about Trump. Now, also from the beginning, Billy Boy and the Prince have, are a different story. Billy Gates was a late addition. Dersh got blamed early but looks to be cleared. Dersh knows almost everything. All the rest is speculation....
Elon has the funds to make this a real ___storm.
He just needs to say he will finance any victims who want to press charges or pursue civil litigation—and he will sue the Justice Department to get the files.
Then if the files are claimed fake the courts (hostile leftist judges) get to enter the fray and evaluate the evidence.
What could possibly go wrong? Lol.
(Some real and some fake victims might come forward for sure—and the muddy waters will just get muddier.)
I despise titles that merely say what isn’t.
For months Bondi was eager to talk and talk about the Epstein case; her successful struggle to wrench a huge quantity of evidence out of the EDNY; the client list on her desk, etc.
Big attack on Iran’s nuclear program, undoubtedly involving much coordination with and intel from Israel. Netanyahu visits Trump in DC. Nomination for Nobel Prize.
Soon thereafter, Bondi, Patel, and Bongino are sent out to proclaim the Epstein really did commit suicide; Bondi says the evidence is all just child porn Epstein possessed (with zero curiosity on what he did with it, which was not necessarily for his own gratification — maybe providing child porn was part of his client grooming and compromising schemes).
What happened that changed the hypefest to “Epstein who?” Nothing to see here, move along.”
Who directed the initial hypefest? Who ordered the 180 degree turn? Who do all these people work for?
‘Why Hasn’t the DOJ Questioned Cindy McCain About Jeffrey Epstein?’
“We all knew what Epstein was doing but no legal entity would do anything about it” - Cindy McCain
So far, my problem lies here.
1) American Children were sex trafficked and Children were Sex Trafficked in America.
2) Rich and powerful world leaders are able to do this to American Childre and Children in America.
3) So far, political connections are all it takes to avoid consequences of Child rape and even murder of how many Children and or American children?
Alan Dershowitz is on record saying that powerful people are being protected. He says he can’t divulge any names because of a court order.
You are on target about Bondi.
The following is just me trying to make sense of this, with criticism welcome. Trump directed, or at least acquiesced to, what Bondi was doing. I think something happened, or entered Trump’s mind, that caused him to order his employees to kill the Epstein story. Not sure if this was to cover up for Epstein associates or himself, or to protect intel channels, or maybe Trump was jealous of Bondi/others getting too much attention over it, who knows. Several things (the awkward way it was handled, Bondi’s rookie performance at the cabinet-meeting press op, the Bongino angst, Trump’s subsequent expression of support for Bondi, et al.) suggest that Trump directed the 180 and the others were following orders loyally but unhappily.
The same swamp that went after Trump since 2016 is the same that Epstein was working with. The swamp must’ve freaked in 2016 because they didn’t have anything good on him. Comey tried to tease something out by mentioning the dossier but Trump denied it. The swamp was screwed.
Hence, all the drama including the fixing of the 2020 election, which is why Trump should care about this. Same folks involved.
The Foreign Aid to Israel sure doesn’t reflect that.
And all it takes is for some Con Inc./Republican “leader” to call it no big deal or more important things ($$) to worry about and “conservatives” drop it like a hot potato.
I think at least part of what President Trump said was true.
There probably were some “ringers” the previous administration left in the files.
It was going to be tough to explain them—and he did not want to go there.
If so it was a tough call—and I disagree with it fwiw—and it made his staff look like clowns.
One of the many "Trust me, bro. I've got insider sources." accounts on social media, I'm sure.
That is a reasonable position—and if valid the President should have owned that.
“There are major national security implications with these files. I plan to release what I can when I can—but these national security issues need to be addressed first.”
That was Epstein Op. 1.0.
Now we are looking at Epstein Op. 2.0.
That's SDNY controling the evidence, modifying and/or deleting the evidence, then giving something to Bondi and Trump, and then watching all the boogie traps explode.
Or we can trust the man Deep State tried to murder on live TV a year ago.
There’s a thought.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.