“Even rare vaccination-related harms, both known and unknown, now have a higher chance of outweighing potential benefits in non-high-risk populations”
That might be true.
I would like to see some numbers to back up that assertion.
Agree
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Top FDA official rejects COVID-19 vaccines, citing unknown risks (Paywall), JSM_Liberty wrote: “Even rare vaccination-related harms, both known and unknown, now have a higher chance of outweighing potential benefits in non-high-risk populations”
That might be true.
I would like to see some numbers to back up that assertion.
We all wanted to see actual data to show that we even needed the vax. Nothing was forthcoming.
The FDA filings for Moderna and Pfizer specified that the pharmas had 'data gaps'. Not only were we not shown the data, we weren't shown these data gaps. The following is an excerpt re the absence of information for the Covid19 vaccines the entire world was pressured to take excerpted from Christian Elliot's article (April 15, 2021), 18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a COVID Vaccine
If that’s not alarming enough, here are other gaps in the data — in other words, there is no data to suggest safety or efficacy regarding:
- Anyone younger than age 18 or older than age 55.
- Pregnant or lactating mothers.
- Autoimmune conditions.
- Immunocompromised individuals.
- No data on transmission of COVID.
- No data on preventing mortality from COVID.
- No data on duration of protection from COVID.
In case you think I’m making this up, or want to see the actual documents sent to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna for their Emergency Use Authorization, you can check out this, or this respectively. The data gaps can be found starting with page 46 and 48 respectively.
For now let’s turn our eyes to the raw data the vaccine makers used to submit for emergency use authorization …
5. No access to raw data from trials
Would you like to see the raw data that produced the “90% and 95% effective” claims touted in the news?
Me too. But the companies won’t let us see that data.
As pointed out in the BMJ, something about the Pfizer and Moderna efficacy claims smells really funny. There were “3,410 total cases of suspected, but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1,816 in the placebo group.”
Wait … what? Did they fail to do science in their scientific study by not verifying a major variable?
Could they not test those “suspected but unconfirmed” cases to find out if they had COVID? Why not test all 3,410 participants for the sake of accuracy?
In 1977 the Swine Flu vax was pulled after causing 3 dozen reported deaths and 500 reported injuries.
The CoupFlu vaxxes have a far, far higher body count.
Why is human life worth so much less now than it was in ‘77...?