Posted on 07/05/2025 8:51:09 PM PDT by ransomnote
Neurological injuries from vaccination have been documented since the smallpox vaccine over two centuries ago, with severe injuries reported throughout medical literature. The medical profession concealed these injuries, believing public vaccination benefits justified hiding information that might create vaccine hesitancy.
Historical injuries like spreading paralysis mirror current “one in a million” vaccine injuries, but toxicity documentation was erased to preserve the “safe and effective” narrative.
In the past, these injuries were widely reported, but now research into them is widely censored. Many of these forgotten reports are critical for understanding modern “inexplicable” conditions like autism, A Midwestern Doctor writes.
By A Midwestern Doctor, 25 June 2025
Table of Contents
Introduction
Author’s Note: In the US, the requirement to vaccinate is largely based on the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices’ (“ACIP’s”) assessment (and the CDC’s) that the vaccine’s benefits outweigh its risks. Due to the dogmatic faith surrounding vaccination and ACIP’s members having massive conflicts of interest favouring vaccination, virtually every vaccine put before them ends up on the schedule and as a result, each generation of (sicker) children gets even more of them.
A key reason for this is because only a small set of injuries are tested for (typically those that are minor or very rare) and hence officially “exist,” while the much broader gamut of vaccine injuries are swept under the rug. Today, due to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s (“RFK’s”) bold action to replace ACIP’s members, a very different committee will have its first meeting today. For that reason, I felt it was important to highlight one major complication of vaccines: the widespread neurological injuries they cause.
From birth, we are taught that vaccines were one of the most remarkable discoveries in history, and were so safe and effective that many now unimaginable plagues vanished with few to no side effects occurring in the process. In truth, give or take, every part of that mythology is false, and remarkably similar vaccine disasters occur every few decades.
Much of this results from the fact that it is very difficult to produce safe vaccines due to both their mode of action and the methods used in their production. As such, the best “solution” which could be found to this problem was to insist in lockstep that vaccines were safe and erase any memory that vaccine disasters had in fact occurred, thereby making it possible to gaslight anyone who was severely injured by a vaccine and claim their injury was just anecdotal or a product of anti-vaccine hysteria.
For example, recently I discussed how vaccines cause autism and focused on a central argument used to debunk the link between the two – that the only reason people believe vaccines cause autism is because a disgraced British doctor published a fraudulent 1998 study claiming they did and then made everyone start hallucinating that vaccine injuries were occurring.
This mythology, however, ignores that brain injuries were a longstanding problem of vaccination. For example, a 1982 NBC news programme revealed that many parents were having children develop “post-pertussis encephalopathy” after taking the DPT vaccine for diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough) and tetanus, and that most doctors refused to report this.
ransomnote: video available on the linked webpage
If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on BitChute HERE or Odysee HERE.
To quote that programme:
Medical knowledge about severe reactions to the whooping cough vaccine goes back to the early 1930s. Report after report has been published in medical journals since then. In 1948, two American doctors reported on case histories of many children who had been brain-damaged or died from DPT vaccines in Boston. The following year, another doctor surveyed paediatricians across the country and found still more. Those studies have been forgotten.
Likewise, in 1985, one of the most popular talk shows in America, ‘The Phil Donahue Show’, hosted a segment where doctors from both sides (and neurologically injured members of the audience) debated the risks and benefits of vaccination and the ethics of mandates. To the best of my knowledge, this was the last time an open debate of vaccination aired on mainstream television. [You can watch the full 45-minute The Phil Donahue Show on Substack HERE or on Odysee HERE.]
Diagnostic Obfuscation
In both of these 1980s TV programmes and many of the earlier studies on vaccine injuries, the brain damaged children were described as becoming “mentally retarded” or “severely retarded.” However, in the 1990s, “retarded” began to be phased out due to it being deemed too stigmatising, with Barack Obama signing a law in 2010 that replaced all instances in Federal statutes of “mentally retarded” and “mental retardation” with “intellectual disability.”
This is important as it is commonly argued that the increase in autism is not due to an environmental toxin (e.g., vaccines) but rather more and more “normal” things being reclassified as autism. One of the primary studies that supported the reclassification argument is a 2009 study from California that actually showed 26.4% of children who had previously been diagnosed as “mentally retarded” became “autistic” (as did another commonly cited study).
Since autism is deliberately undefined, it encapsulates both profound (severe) autism (25-30% of cases) and autistic traits (e.g., having manageable neurological deficits or “being on the spectrum”). This wordplay hence blends them together, making it possible to slander statements on severe autism while simultaneously tricking people into believing the increase is actually just in autistic quirks.
MORE AT THE LINK: https://expose-news.com/2025/07/02/neurological-damage-from-vaccines/
I don't mean to be rude, but I would expect that a physician learned at some point during medical school that the introduction of viral mRNA into cells is pretty common. It happens with every virus infection. The Covid virus contains 29 different proteins, thus it forces cells to make 29 different mRNAs. Certainly, if there were something intrinsically dangerous about mRNA, someone is far worse off getting an infection with 29 different mRNAs than a vaccine with a single mRNA.
Big piles of excrement are still excrement.
I would not trust any study provided by Big Pharma.
MMR is the worst.
Brain inflammation is brain damage
Son: vaccinated (against my command): Aspergers spectrum disorder, etc etc. A shut in.
Daughter: not vaccinated until 5.8 years so she could go to school.: straight As, head of her classes, all advanced classes, Natl honor society since 6th grade, pre-med track, etc. etc. etc.
Yeah, that's the problem, isn't it? Redefining things as you want, such as the definition of a vaccine.
If RNA repairs damaged DNA...
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51457-9
...and you introduce different RNA, what does the new RNA repair the original damaged DNA to?
That's right - cancer.
More specifically, turbo cancer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.