Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DallasBiff

There is no viable moral argument against killing animals, in the normal manner, for consumption.

The only substantive reasoning against it is reducible to the aesthetic sense.

From what I’ve seen from Peter Singer over the years, he’s not an honest philosopher.


7 posted on 07/02/2025 11:59:08 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

There is no viable moral argument against killing animals, in the normal manner, for consumption.

The only substantive reasoning against it is reducible to the aesthetic sense.

From what I’ve seen from Peter Singer over the years, he’s not an honest philosopher.
*********
If there’s one thing that Christianity, Judaism, and Islam all agree on, it’s that we can eat meat. In fact, Jews are commanded to eat lamb during Passover.


24 posted on 07/02/2025 12:36:17 PM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson