Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

Reply down range, but the crux is as long as the Fed Court system remains operational, the chances of trying civilians in military tribunal setting is very slim. I know what you will say, but civilians involved in treasonous or seditious activity can’t be declared or treated as ‘enemy combatants’. That definition is specific.


4,683 posted on 07/26/2025 6:31:52 AM PDT by xone ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4622 | View Replies ]


To: xone

What about what Kavanaugh says?


4,705 posted on 07/26/2025 8:39:10 AM PDT by little jeremiah (SCARE: Social Chaos And Response Emergency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4683 | View Replies ]

To: xone

President Trump reposts the meme with the criminals and military tribunals on it, and keeps saying this as well.
That says something, to me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOAkU_4iPYA
Graham asks Kavanaugh about Military Tribunals


4,707 posted on 07/26/2025 8:43:02 AM PDT by little jeremiah (SCARE: Social Chaos And Response Emergency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4683 | View Replies ]

To: xone
as long as the Fed Court system remains operational, the chances of trying civilians in military tribunal setting is very slim

We have at least one SCOTUS judge connected to the treason. FISA judges and 200-300 federal judges neck deep in the treasonous conspiracy.

That's not "operational".

4,749 posted on 07/26/2025 1:00:07 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4683 | View Replies ]

To: xone; little jeremiah
That definition is specific.

Can a new one be created?

4,769 posted on 07/26/2025 2:41:40 PM PDT by AFB-XYZ (( We have two options: 1. Stand up, or 2. Bend over))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4683 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson