In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 07/01/2025 Vol.509, Q Day 2803, aMorePerfectUnion wrote: Interesting Q stuff I saw on GA…
“ For the ones who’ve been around since 2018 you probably remember the good old days of Bill Barr. Back then when Q was posting, he referred to him as BB or B2. He also implied that was the stealth bomber. Suffice to say, nothing happened, and everyone forgot about it and moved on with their lives.
ransomnote: Thank you for posting, AMPU. It led my thoughts in various directions - they like to get out. :D
During the Bill Barr days, the trolls hated him and I believed he was limited in taking action because the DOJ was so corrupt (where could you get a 'clean' judge?). Not willing to risk double jeapordy etc. But then one day FR's resident trolls abruptly said Barr was good, and I thought, "Uh Oh...he folded?" He resigned and Trump has said since then that Barr was afraid of being impeached. That sounds right to me.
But even if Barr hadn't been afraid of being impeached, I don't see how a few White Hats in the DOJ could get justice - any judge could be/would be surrounded on all sides by corruption and the never ending appeal process would likely fall into the hands of corrupt judges all the way to the Supreme Court. After all these years, I'm still not sure about the B-2 references. He may have had an avenue or avenues to use to function in stealth mode and ultimately didn't use them. Otherwise, why would the head of the DOJ be considered a 'stealth' threat to bad guys? Perhaps Barr had stealth leverage and was afraid to use it.
For the first few years, Barr didn't act against President Trump when he could have (RussiaGate), and then it seems he ultimately folded because he didn't believe he could defend himself from impeachment. I can't imagine what would have happened if he turned to join Mueller in the RussiaGate effort; Capital Punishment would be the sentence the kangaroo trial. On the upside, we would have seen the military intervene. FWIW: I just checked and it looks like there's no precedent for the removal via impeachment of the US Attorney General, but the law does say 'civil officers' can be removed that way, so they would have to establish precedent (something they do without hesitation).
Fast forward to the last couple of weeks. All of sudden, we got a reappearance of the B2 bombers after their raid on the Iranian nuclear facilities.
So how did Trump celebrate the signing of the BBB? By having a B2 stealth bomber fly overhead. Think symbolism.Did Trump just tell us that the BBB is the actual stealth bomber?
What did Q say about stealth bombers?Q post 3668 When a B2 bomber is no longer STEALTH (think public statements made last week) what must that signal?
Q post 2676 Optics are important. STEALTH bombers silent?
Q post 2381 and 2397 How do you navigate around installed corrupt [FBI][DOJ]? USE A STEALTH BOMBER
I believed that Trump had one or more strategic uses for the BBB which I could not grasp - whatever it was, it seemed incredibly important. But there were obvious wins too.President Trump has planned military celebration of July 4 before, and he knew about the planned use of the B-2's while the 4th of July celebration was planned, so the history-making B-2 performance in Iran would naturally feature in any flyover. Surely at a military celebration on July 4, the airforce WOULD have flyover; the B-2's success in Iran have been maligned in the MSM and showcasing their true sucess would be ideal. The military should get credit for excellence.So I was never sure of the original B2 references, and I'm not certain of the B2 references this time either. But if these are comms, they will not the first I've missed!Is there any evidence that the DOJ and FBI are corrupt? The current Diddy trial was prosecuted by Comey’s daugher and from what the commentators were saying, she threw in the towel from day 1. A lot of J6 prosecutors got promoted to key positions. We are also being told that there are no Epstein lists anymore. Clearly showing us that they aren’t exactly trustworthy.I would say we know many federal courts are still corrupt because they keep attacking everything the Trump administration is trying to do. Any court with Comey's daughter can be counted as corrupt.I do think there are complicating factors like Ukraine still in play - it used to be that Zelensky seemed to threaten/risk WWIII whenever Epstein was mentioned. It's almost been a little 'too quiet' re the war there. So perhaps pulling back on Epstein and 'letting' the war of attrition continue is the plan there. Saying 'there's no Epstein evidence' now allows them to 'find' evidence later.I don't believe that file folders containing Epstein contents remained in Bondi's office for months, and that she announced she would expose them, without her first looking at them. Any normal person given the Epstein files would, likely on Day 1 in office, have reviewed them. Bondi was charged with getting justice; she'd want to know what she had to work with and what she had to acquire. Bondi was likely surrounded by people in DOJ and elsewhere who are implicated in those files - she'd want to watch her back, know who's motivated to cause harm etc. As prosecutor, Bondi needed time to evaluate strategy from hundreds of different angles. I don't believe the FBI hid the files even though there was 'no evidence' in them.I don't believe anyone, least of all the US Attorney General, would have a) waited a few months to look in the files and b) accepted the notion that the Epstein file case history fit in her office much less fit in a few file folders. Recall the libraries of videos etc. and his various properties - that's a mountinous case. So I'm saying Bondi knew that she didn't have the Epstein files in her office, and that truckloads of it were missing. She's talked about the pedo tapes.Personally, I believe Trump would have a) been monitoring her prepartion for Epstein and other pivotal prosecution and b) already taken action if Bondi was not performing. He knows how to make life miserable for those who won't carry out his agenda. If he knows she faces understandable obstacles, he would remain supportive.As I've said before, I suspect that Bondi, Patel and Bongino are doing as Trump asks, and that they were directed to focus on Epstein and other issues prior to gaining office, and then were redirected on Day 1 to deal with more pressing issues (enemies in and among them in the government). 'Secure the perimeter!' or some organizational equivalent like that.What about the DOJ? Well, after months of the Epstein list will be released in 2 weeks, it’s all crickets. So far no major arrests of any low hanging fruit. Just usual DOJ picking up scammers and co. While important, this isn’t what the American public asked for.
It looks like the Deep State response made them choose different tactics (deals/threats etc.) If/when any of his key players can't or won't do their jobs, I trust President Trump will act. He hasn't even chided them yet- which would be signficant optics for lesser failures. Basically, I think only massive credible threats to American safety or strategy would put us in the holding pattern we're in.If we actually had 3 cabinet members (Bondi, Patel, and Dan Bongino) threatened into inaction, then the White Hats are not in a position to perp walk anybody right now anyway. Replacing them would just bring 3 more people into the line of fire. Our overall position as a country, and as a government, has to be made sound enough to take a beating prior to perp walks and fallout. We have millions of illegal foreign fighters in our country right now who face deportation and hardship instead of the spoils of war they were promised. This has to be hideously complex and the complexity is dismissed or overlooked by genuinely understandable, but simpler demands to 'see perp walks and jumpsuits'.Cutting funding for Medicaid and SNAP was a very fast way to turn off the financial tap for those offering provision to their illegal immigrant army. Considering the unofficial armies in our midst is important when looking for orange jumpsuits.
There would be a domino effect from the financial elements of the bill, which are likely pivotal to winning the mid-terms. Biden tanked America and Trump wants people to see, ASAP, that he is restoring it. So while it looks like 'crickets' on the Epstein front, it's not crickets elsewhere. This information war includes massive battles and massive preparation.
I think when arrests start it's 'go time' for the black hats and that may mean simultaneous launch(es) or attempts to create WWIII style conflict in Ukraine, China and at home (asymmetrical warfare, cyberattacks, social unrest, economic attacks, possible biowarfare 'scares'). Well, scares of every kind. In the midst of all this, the ship of state needs to remain upright; it's best to nullify as much of that in advance as possible.
In reading or watching analysis of airline disasters, there's a catch phrase to describe a certain kind of fatal inattentiveness that arises when trying to solve multiple extreme crises summed up with the phrase, "Someone forgot to fly the plane." Paerhaps desperate attempts to gain control over unpredictable erratic flight, or to free stuck landing gear ends with inattentiveness to other basic, flight critical details (e.g. altitude) which ultimately bring the plane down. In this case, Trump's BBB helps tend to stable economic 'flight' in advance of disruption; otherwise the Deep State could prevent such legislation from passing for months if not years. With the latest defection of a republican, that legislation giving ICE what it needs is likely the only chance it had to become law until after the midterms, if possible. Passage moves us into a better position to endure the disruption planned. I don't know what else needs to be set in place, in addition to wars and economic tarrifs etc.I write that last sentence and pause to be amazed at how well President Trump has thwarted planned disruption for 8 years. In Oregon, I've read complaints that rioters there are angry their riots are being ignored. I think there were likely false flags planned for July 4 which were thwarted. I wonder what would have happened at the Capitol if Trump had not planned a military parade.So what does Trump do? Reward the most productive US enforcement agency so far: ICE. ICE currently has a bigger budget than the FBI and CIA(officially).
President Trump was chiding ICE and removed someone (I forget the name) to get deportations moving faster. Moles embedded in official places were thwarting efforts. The Deep STate strategies slowed down progress so the POTUS seems justified in asking for and getting the money he needs to complete the purging of foreign armies living on medicaid, snap and public housing.Again, I suspect ICE 'needs' to get that funding because there will likely be no more allocations which make it through Congress for some time and the task of deporting millions quickly is unprecedented.FWIW: Controlling nationwide riots has always been a challenge - think of the usual 'process' one must go through for each person arrested. Just a cheerful reminder here - ICE agents can be deputized as US Marshals; good to have extras! What if helos could scoop up rioters and drop them off directly at facilities for processing like the ones DeSantis is creating? Trump has removed 'the process' impediments. Slap a bar code wrist bracelet on each foreign army arrest and from there keep deporting to foreign countries to clear the space for new arrests. Years ago, I recall China and other countries were said to be appalled at a new process our mil used to deploy soldiers quickly as it employed bar codes and streamlined deployment processes that they couldn't match. Yes - let's do that if/when the protesters/foreign militias make their 'big move'.Q told us that before tribunals can happen, mass unrest needs to occur. Only then can military assets be deployed under the guise of riot control. Q post 4414. Notice how the military is being deployed more and more often on the US soil.(Marines to California and Florida for example) It’s as if the normies are being conditioned to think it’s ok for the US military to assist with domestic operations.
I think it's almost qute the way Newsom and the mayor of LA 'cried' when Trump sent troops there. They insisted the troops triggered the riots. They are skeerd. I do believe the military is the only way.So what could trigger mass riots nationwide? What about the arrest of a sitting Congresswoman, being stripped of her citizenship and shipped overseas.(Ilhan Omar). Lately her marriage to her brother has been entering the public convo more and more often. Or what about that NY mayoral candidate. Trump literally said that he won’t let a communist become the mayor of NY.
Which enforcement branch that’s not compromised can do this? ICE
Would that explain why the BBB basically gave them unlimited funds? Maybe, maybe not. Time will tell.So far, the Deep State is able to create riots whenever and wherever they want, for imagined slights and injustices. I wouldn't guess Ilhan Omar would be the first arrest unless her actions are clear treason, and even then, she's not that compelling in a cast of thousands, including traitors skilled at sex trafficking children and other crimes against humanity (hmmm...Fauci?). Exposing elite pedo rings would have the support of every normal parent and single adults. But yes, any arrest of any Democrat for any reason can be framed as an assault on freedom (i.e., the elites), and as the anticipated attack of a fascist regime.Everything that Trump does, every day he does it, shortens the fuse the Deep State has before it decides it's out of time and makes its moves. The Deep Staters wouldn't resort to a 'Hail Mary' pass because they serve darkness, so perhaps it's when they make their 'Hail Satan' play. Yet Trump and co., Q and our mil and patriots far and wide have tamped down so much and are working to defuse so much more I have no idea what scale of unrest we might see.
If this was conventional war, what would be the target? Decapitation of leadership? Arrest those who direct those beneath them who pose the greatest threat(s)? I dunno how to adapt conventional warfare to information warfare strategies, but Omar doesn't see like a linchpin, and I think Trump &co. are tamping down bigger riots than we are seeing. This keeps us stable and functioning economically - I wonder how far the White Hats can take the calm in spite of the storm?
Prayers UP UP UP! May God bless those who stand in harms way at every level. Please crush our enemies and show us how best to serve You. Father in Heaven, strengthen us and lead us. Thank you for the tireless blessings we receive.
