Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

In Alaska in particular, the argument is that as soon as it is in private hands, it will be cut off from the ability to hunt and fish. People would block the land and block access. A minor argument is that big businesses would buy land and develop it and harm the natural environment. Whether for tourism or resource development.


5 posted on 06/27/2025 7:06:15 AM PDT by vpintheak (Screw the ChiComms! America first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: vpintheak

Large amounts of land in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan (U.P.) are owned by paper companies to harvest their wood in good time.


9 posted on 06/27/2025 7:10:07 AM PDT by desertsolitaire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: vpintheak

Interesting insight into Alaska. Have a brother that has lived there since 78 or so. Just had a nice trip there last month. From Fairbanks to Seward. Beautiful, beautiful state.

It sounds like the mining companies cannot be trusted to preserve the environment.


14 posted on 06/27/2025 7:18:16 AM PDT by Dartoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: vpintheak

I don’t think those fears are unfounded.


22 posted on 06/27/2025 8:15:40 AM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson