Do you not understand net zero?!?
“Do you not understand net zero?!?”
I am aware of netzero it cannot be achieved without a massive drop in resource use. In theory nuclear power, solar ,wind and biomass could get close. Add in some seawater capture or bury biomass in landfills salted with rock salt to keep decay at near zero and yea the math works it would be hideously wasteful yo bury biomass but it could be done as that would turn the overall balance negative. The question would be can you have 8.8 billion people with anywhere near a livable standard of living if you have to bury 3/4 of your biomass per year to offset the petrochemicals you still need for all the not fuel uses of liquid hydrocarbons. The answer is probably not, a small select few could live pretty lavishly and hit net zero it won’t be cheap that’s for sure.