\
no dispensationalist Christian , thats what you call Christians who rightly reject replacement theology, believes or does that.
you have made a slanderous accusation , i.e a false witness btw, and used it as a strawman argument .
shame on you broham.
Any shame I might have had or will have has been nailed to the cross. What you call slanderous accusation others would call opinion or viewpoint.
Are you familiar with the term 'Dual Covenant Theology'?
Dual-covenant theology posits that God has established two distinct covenants: one for Jews through the Mosaic Law (Old Covenant) and another for Gentiles through Jesus Christ (New Covenant). This perspective suggests that both covenants are valid pathways to God, with Jews potentially achieving salvation by adhering to the Mosaic Law, while Gentiles find salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.
Here are some of its adherents:
Franz Rosenzweig: His writings, particularly The Star of Redemption, are often cited as a foundational text for this perspective.
John Hagee: While he has denied explicitly endorsing dual-covenant theology, his views on the Jewish people's relationship with God have been a subject of discussion.
Yaakov Emden: His writings from the 18th century are often cited as a foundational text for this perspective. Certain segments of the Christian Zionist movement: Some groups within this movement have been accused of implicitly embracing dual-covenant theology, although they may deny it .
Some theologians and Christian leaders, such as Reinhold Niebuhr, have been associated with this theology.
Like most Christians, I would argue that teaching salvation can be achieved through the Mosaic Law absent Christ is contrary to the gospel that Paul taught. I'm not saying that you embrace dual-covenant theology, only that there are those who do.