[Dr. Sivana]

Surrender is the only option that has any chance of promoting peace in the mid-East. Anything else is Neville Chamberlain all over again.

Why would they abide by terms of surrender if they will not abide by a ceasefire?

The only way to enforce is to occupy. Not worth doing.

[econjack]

I don’t think that’s the case. Surrender means the victor has some influence in construction the new power base in the country, if for no other reason than it can demand the leaders be turned over to the victors.