Posted on 06/18/2025 11:55:54 AM PDT by jerod
The verdict is in....
One or more of the men who were at 34 Fairview tat night murdered O’Keefe. My money’s on Higgins...the DEA agent who had the hots for Karen and was the guy who,after leaving the second bar,texted O’Keefe saying “are you coming here???” (meaning 34 Fairview”).
Why did they kill O’keefe?
So you are saying he was lured to his death over this woman?. I heard the texts read between Karen and this guy. Karen was just as suggestive and hot as he was, maybe more. In fact, in the texts this guy said he “really liked Okeefe, a good guy”. But let’s face it this poor sucker was being used by Karen to make Okeefe jealous, which is a typical ploy for forty-six year old “cougars” who are losing their edge. They can look in the mirror and say, “I still have it”.
So if I was on the jury I would have to think which is more incriminating.
Read: “I hit him, I hit him, I hit him, could I have hit him”
Higgins: “Where are you”. Which is actually what he asked
Here is a link for Attorney Melanie Little. She did a great job covering this case. Most of the evidence was not shown to the jury. So many things held back by a Biblical Dishonest Judge and corrupt state attorney (He Defended Whitey Bulger)
There is a lot of content here check it out.
https://www.youtube.com/@AttorneyMelanieLittle
“ Why did they kill O’keefe?”
****************************
To a near certainty (IMHO) they didn’t intend to kill him. Most likely they, in their drunken state, wanted to rough him up and “kick his ass”. He was knocked over backwards and hit his head on either a concrete step in the garage or a piece of exercise equipment in the basement.
I’m always surprised to see the number of gullible people who are easily gaslit…. even here on FR. Of course, some may simply be ignorant of all the facts and believe whatever the “authorities” say,
That about sums it up. The arm injuries convinced me she didn’t kill him. Those looked like dog bites, not bruises or cuts from the small broken tail light. There seems to be a lot of corruption in that police department.
The events of that night were obvious and straightforward. They got into a fight. She backed into him. He died in the snow. The conspiracy is an over complicated, convoluted, bizarre narrative.
The jury has the collective iq of a soap dish.
where?
how?
These are what dog bite wounds look like:
You would have to live here to know how corrupt are the Canton, Boston, and State Police.
She was most certainly framed by them to cover up for bad deeds done by cops.
In Texas Taylor becomes Tater.
Have you always been gullible and easily gaslit? Just IMHO, of course.
"I hit him...I hit him" was shown in the second trial to be perjured testimony. Yup...perjury was a very,*very* important part of the second trial...and the first one...and in testimony given before State *and* Federal Grand Juries. As were "butt dials"...destroyed cell phones...dogs that somehow vanished from the face of the earth...etc
Never heard of this case.
You don't get to Massachusetts much,do ya!
It was covered...start to finish...by Court TV.
“It’s Massachusetts
Very corrupt!”
I worked a quasi-governmental summer office job in a small but well-known Mass. town back in the ‘90s.
The police were in and out during the day, and bragging about the free sh!t people gave them, from meals to expensive stuff. They didn’t even try to hide it, because it wasn’t a “thing” for them; it was just life.
I was gobsmacked after working for a city in another state for 20 years. No free stuff — not even coffee. One inspector was fired and disgraced forever because he had accepted a free tire from a local merchant.
Or at least that's what the very same Norfolk County DA ruled. Turns out that the Feds disagreed and are now running the case against this killer cop.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.