Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: noiseman

Yeah, that’s probs right.

Just kind of struck with the feeling of dread, that the site in question is in fact impregnable from the air.

Thereby necessitating a “boots on the ground” direct ground attack nobody seems willing to engage in. If disabling this particular facility is turning out to be the “sine qua non” of this whole affair.


88 posted on 06/18/2025 2:19:31 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: one guy in new jersey

“Thereby necessitating a “boots on the ground” direct ground attack nobody seems willing to engage in. If disabling this particular facility is turning out to be the “sine qua non” of this whole affair.”

even if it comes to boots on the ground this is why we have Navy Seals and The Unit inside of Delta Force. You don’t need 500,000 troops in the desert. You need a platoon of motivated guys and some C4 or better yet a Special Atomic Demolition Munition. The Seals train for the SADM mission at least they did. Smuggle one in set the timer and poof no more bunker complex it is just collapsed rubble there would be no radiation cloud it’s all under thousands of tonnes of rubble.

Iran can never have a nuke that means direct action missions by the special warfare group so be it.


93 posted on 06/18/2025 3:04:58 AM PDT by GenXPolymath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson