To: grundle
She doesn’t have my sympathy. Don’t have kids if you cannot afford them. Bad relationship decisions. Doesn’t watch what she eats.
She needs less food.
She continues this life because Uncle Sam supports her. She will not change.
Ideally there should to be a way to temporarily help people in a time of need, but not permanently support them for the rest of their lives.
To: moviefan8
“Ideally there should to be a way to temporarily help people in a time of need, but not permanently support them for the rest of their lives.”
I always thought that was the way all Welfare was supposed to work, but am learning that’s not true. One generation after another in the same family is sucking up the money WE worked for.
44 posted on
06/13/2025 4:22:56 AM PDT by
MayflowerMadam
(It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
To: moviefan8
Ideally there should to be a way to temporarily help people in a time of need, but not permanently support them for the rest of their lives.
That's the traditional role of local churches. When government raised our taxes to go into the welfare business, donations went down. It has been a downward spiral ever since.
52 posted on
06/13/2025 4:29:30 AM PDT by
bankwalker
(Feminists, like all Marxists, are ungrateful parasites.)
To: moviefan8
Ideally there should to be a way to temporarily help people in a time of need, but not permanently support them for the rest of their lives.There was a guy who had his own billboard in Caldwell, Idaho several years back. One of his quips was "Welfare was meant to be a temporary safety net, not a multi-generational hammock."
84 posted on
06/13/2025 6:38:10 AM PDT by
IYAS9YAS
(There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson