Posted on 06/12/2025 6:12:51 PM PDT by Racketeer
She had plenty of time to do it and it was never important to her.
Ahhh - thanks ...
And speaking of 4th grade intellect...I could easily beaten you in any debate, at the age of nine and however old you physically are right now.
Nobody is agreeing with you; NOBODY ON THIS THREAD!
It's way past your bedtime; n00b, just quietly go away...as we all snicker at you.
But should it look like a complete ethnic cleansing under the guise of immigration control? Because that is what it is starting to look like.
“Mexicans can join the military to obtain citizenship...”
That is exactly right...
Lol... Once again thumping your chest on the playground.
That is right, it doesn’t happen over night. And this couple actually made the effort to do that.
Take a slow down hotrod, you are going to pop a gasket... lol
Given the targets set and the pace at which they’re going, only 4 million of the 20+ illegals in this country will be deported by the time Trump leaves office. As posted by a Freeper on another thread:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4322656/posts?page=41#41
What I’d like to see is going after the criminals and gang members first, next get the ones living on the dole and the newly arrived ones living in hotels at taxpayer expense (while we have homeless vets camping on our sidewalks grr) -— before moving on to people like the marine’s wife in question.
If we can only deport so many, let’s make sure we start with the criminals followed by those living on the taxpayers’ dime. These should be the first to go, no?
See also my post here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4322656/posts?page=65#65
It isn’t that easy for immigrant spouses to gain permanent residency and then citizenship. It’s expensive, maybe $3000, a lot of paperwork, and may require returning to country of origin briefly. Government websites can give you all the steps.
If you give up and take your chances because of expense, not wanting to go to original country, or sheer frustration, well, you took your chances.
You are incapable of debate, have yet to respond to all of the other comments on this thread, which don't agree with you stance; hence, you're just in this for virtue signally and attention.
So have the last words...since nobody else is giving you the time of day.
If you read the whole article it sounds like they may let the wife stay.
That requirement went away back in the 70s. I got married in 1977 while in the Marine Corps and I didn't need any permission.
Yet another sob story....
If they're here legally.
Once it "gets around"? Like this is the first time members of the military have seen this.
They likely didn't get married until after he left the Marine Corps, if they're even married at all.
If you want 3,000 per day, you are going to have to remove people that have final deportation orders already signed by a judge. The system is so broken that everyone that gets picked up today will not be removed for years so you star with what you can while starting the process with the ones you really want gone.
There was a good article from Real Clear Investigations that looked at the legal process as it is today when trying to deport someone.
“What I’d like to see is going after the criminals and gang members first, next get the ones living on the dole and the newly arrived ones living in hotels at taxpayer expense (while we have homeless vets camping on our sidewalks grr) -— before moving on to people like the marine’s wife in question.
If we can only deport so many, let’s make sure we start with the criminals followed by those living on the taxpayers’ dime. These should be the first to go, no?”
Absolutely!
“Your”mind” is so “open”, all of your brains fell out long ago.”
Did you think of that all by yourself? Absolute brilliant exercise of sadism!
************
We don’t need low level discourse on Free Republic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.