The era was not about equality. It established law to make women have more rights than men, while claiming it was just making them equal. Its just like title ix. Title ix makes women a protected higher class because it forces schools to create and carve out sports for women regardless of whether anyone or the school or anyone there wants to play them, at the expense of men. Because they shut down some of the mens sports in order to redirect money towards the womens sports. Not a single mens sports team gets protected status the womens teams get.
The entire womens rights movement has been about establishing privilege, a superior position over men. They are favored in courts and play up the victimhood. They dont want equality, they want superiority. What that is today, we see by their actions. When equality works for them, they push for equality. When equality doesnt work for them and requires them being held responsible and accountablemfor their actions and choices, they no longer demand equality, but cry for exemptions, exceptions, and special treatment.
That is why I said I want equality under the law, because if we had it, the law would treat everyone the same, no double standards and hypocrisy, both men and women, not treating women as super citizens that get all the benefits of equality but also get special preferential treatment to duck and avoid responsibility and accountability because they’re just helpless wittle girls and patriarchy bad....
Maybe you kind of get what I mean better now. I’d be all for biblical law. The law didnt make a lot of distinction between men and women. Women would be put to death for the same crimes men would be. They didnt spare them or give them special treatment because they were women. Equality under the law is biblical. The 10 commandments didn’t have easier requirements for women. The consequences of breaking laws were not easier on them either.
Also proving the era wasn’t about equality of men and women, these w9men whowere so gung ho about equality, did nothing to also push for equality in areas where women traditionally outnumbered men. They never said there needed to be more male nurses. Or stop reducing the number of male schoolteachers and journalists and veterinarians. They never cared abkout inequality when it affected men negatively. The era never was about equality, and this showed it.
I didn’t say Biblical law.
I’ve always understood what you’re saying.
I point out Godly living which is the prophylactic and the antidote.