Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
Just my opinion, of course, but language didn't emerge from top-down design (e.g., a king’s experiment) but from bottom-up necessity.

It isn’t something we acquired long after becoming human. It’s something we developed as soon as we need to make meaning—as soon as we realized we were conscious and needed to communicate with another person. Whether it’s warning about a coming storm or a lion in the bush, even the most primitive humans would have found ways to encode reality into sound, gesture, or expression.

That’s symbolic thinking—the essence of language. Even animals have it.

We didn’t wait for grammar books to speak. We wrap our reality in language from the moment we realize sound or gesture can carry meaning. It evolves with our needs, our surroundings, and our relationships—just like the personal “language” many of us use with animals.

Language isn’t a cultural artifact layered on top of thought. It is thought, externalized—a living system of symbols shaped by survival, emotion, and connection.

13 posted on 06/03/2025 3:18:39 AM PDT by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RoosterRedux

It’s both.


19 posted on 06/03/2025 3:50:50 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (The best thing about a muzzie civil war is, everyone wins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson