Posted on 06/02/2025 1:11:52 PM PDT by marcusmaximus
First thing they should do is build hangers for each of our nuclear capable bombers. B2s have their own rapid set up hanger, make them for the Buff and B1. YESTERDAY....then you can build up the anti-UAS stuff around the hangers, but right now, sitting on a tarmac is a NO GO. Hell, I’m surprised the anti-nuclear fanatics haven’t tried this yet.
The machine gun. It completely ended the use of horse cavalry, which had been the arm of "shock and awe" for several thousand years.
You stated above “ SALT and START treaty requirements are that the delivery vehicles must be visible at all times. So sealing them up in hangars isn’t a solution”
Now you admit bombers can be stored in a hanger and just have to be made visible “on request”.
In short, you were wrong.
It’s no big deal to be wrong. Refusing to admit error, however, is just gross.
“Russia could crush Ukraine like a cockroach.”
So why haven’t they?
L
Do you want them to Mr. WWW III Enthusiast?
“Prepare separation agreement. Prepare extensive email re options for termination”
Russia withdrew from SALT in 2023.
Also, it never was a violation of SALT or START to keep bombers in a hanger. B2 and B21 are always kept in hangers, for example. They just had to be made available for inspection.
Apologies for the wrong quote.
Copied from a a bill asking what it was!
Psychological ripples. Adding to the measure of unknown is the fact that the adversary looks and sounds like them. What a trainwreck.
Your post makes no sense given your earlier posts.
What Ukraine did to Russia with trucks, Russia, China or Iran could do to us with ship containers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.