And the 30 million acre Gulf of America wind farm........?
Has nothing to do with this really.
By 2035, already-being-implemented battery technology will allow wind farms and solar to be used for use surges, while nuclear remains useful for a steady output for baseline energy usage. That baseline usage probably represents 40% or more of energy usage, meaning nuclear could more than double to meet baseline, and maybe double again by the time electric vehicles and a revitalized domestic industry are accounted for. But at the same time, nuclear power can’t be scaled up and down over a short period, so beyond 40% would require the same sort of battery-enabled delay that solar and wind require. And of course, solar is already much cheaper than conventional nuclear power.
You didn’t really think this article was proposing a single-solution energy policy, did you?