Posted on 05/17/2025 3:57:25 AM PDT by Libloather
Bkmk
“..Of the nine, the four most verbose Justices were all four of the women. Let that sink in for awhile....”
That’s why anyone with a modicum of intelligence considers it an outright total clown show. A bad joke on the American People.
It’s completey lost all respect of the People. No one really gives it any credence anymore. They’re at the point of just being totally ignored.
Other than Thomas, and maybe Alito, the rest of em are just moronic, corrupt, political scum. My dog’s penis has more “legal jurisprudence”. At least he knows what a real bitch is.
There is a reason why the Founding Fathers did NOT want women involved in politcss/govt...and it wasn’t sexism. It was their thought process being based on over emotionalism, not facts. The SCOTUS is a classic example. They’ve become a Poster Boy for it.
The DemonRATS are working on making it that a LEO that catches a criminal in the process of a murder or robbing a bank, is going to have to drive back to the office and get some “judge” aho to sign an arrest warrant. We’re working to the point that it would be more efficient for a LEO to just “dust” a perp caught in the commission of a crime.
And that’s why he had been ruled as deportable.
Xinis is arguing that the withholding he was granted didn’t allow him to be deported to El Salvador. Abrego Garcia said he would be in danger from a rival gang if he went back to El Salvador. This is an admission of his MS-13 gang membership. A person can be protected from going to a country where they would be targeted for any of just 5 reasons: their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. The only one that applies to Abrego Garcia is membership in a particular social group, and the social group that he is a member of that would put him in danger is MS-13.
In my previous post I posted the exact language of the statute that governs withholdings. It specifically states that a withholding can NOT prevent deportation if any of several conditions are true, and one of those is if the AG has good reason to believe that the person’s presence in the United States poses a danger to the United States. In such a case, a withholding simply doesn’t apply. No process is prescribed; the withholding simply doesn’t apply.
Interestingly, another condition that renders a withholding moot is if “the alien ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of an individual because of the individual’s race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion;” The whole basis for Abrego Garcia’s withholding in the first place was his membership in MS-13, which by definition means that he has done those very things to those who belong to a different gang. So even if he didn’t pose a danger to the United States, a withholding could not apply to him.
But there is every reason to believe he is a danger to the United States since 1) MS-13 is now a declared terrorist organization and 2) the guy who hired him has admitted to hiring him to traffic illegals.
Judge Xinis is totally blowing off the actual statute that governs withholding, while using his withholding as the whole reason for everything she is saying.
Somebody in conservative media needs to point this stuff out loudly and clearly, cuz the general public isn’t gonna hear the truth from this judge or from anybody (Fox. cough, cough, cough) who reports on this judge’s proceedings.
You are right. I listened to the 2.5 hour argument on nationwide injunctions/birthright citizenship and was stunned that the first part of the Solicitor General’s presentation was consumed by argumentative questions that continually interrupted him. The rude Justice was Sotomayor that was asking questions to badger and not get info. The interruptions got so bad that CJ Roberts had to remark that he’d like to hear the answer. Media said it was a rebuke. Maybe it was as the interruptions reduced. Robert’s comment was about the time I posted on the blog that you would think that a Supreme Court Justices would know that due process requires the opportunity to be heard. There was not an opportunity with the interruptions.
Gwjack
This is a flat-out lie from Xinis. In one of her filings she noted that a notice of removal was not submitted by the government in this case. That’s because this case is supposed to be about what Trump’s people need to do to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s return. The truth of the matter is the only way they could get El Salvador to return him is by charging him with a crime in the US and asking El Salvador to extradite him. But the US would have to wait in line behind El Salvador’s prosecution and sentencing.
In effect, Xinis is asking the government to indict Abrego Garcia. It’s the only lawful way the US can even ALLOW Bukele to send a terrorist into the US.
Xinis needs to be asked/forced to READ THE IMMIGRATION STATUTE THAT PERTAINS TO WITHHOLDINGS OUT LOUD TO THE COURT.
"The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated." --- Thomas Jefferson, 1821
“There was no order of removal, there was no warrant for removal – there was nothing.”
There was. Since 2019, and still active.
Miserable looking commie
Breanna probably hired when Chris Wallace ran the news room.
LS, you have connections, and maybe know of others who also have connections. Somehow we need to get conservative reporters, podcasters, and influencers to expose what the immigration statute governing withholdings actually says. I posted the statute in the post I’m replying to here, and there is more input about it also at post at https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4317507/posts?page=44#44 If this statute was read aloud people would immediately see how Xinis is deliberately misrepresenting the Abrego Garcia situation. Can you help me get this information to people with megaphones?
Wrong thread? Who is Breanna and what does Chris Wallace have to do with this thread?
Paula has joined dem group who want to overthrow American Gov’t..
Thanks for explaining it in detail. Unfortunately this is to cerebral or too long for busy Americans. This is why the Libs come up with catch phrases like “Maryland Man”. Simple, easy to say, easy to understand (even if a lie).
Could not have said it better myself.
FUGLY DEMOCRAT WOMEN JUDGES GET HYSTERICAL!
Another Marxist scum judge.
“A person can be protected from going to a country where they would be targeted for any of just 5 reasons: their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. The only one that applies to Abrego Garcia is membership in a particular social group, and the social group that he is a member of that would put him in danger is MS-13.”
The group/gang he is a member of no longer exists in El Salvador. They are all in the prison where he is and now he is safe from the other groups/gangs!
Mute issue. lol
looks like Breanne works for Fox news , where Chris Wallace used to brag about how anti Trump he could be. She wrote the article selectively to promote the false story that he Abrego was deported in error.
We were told to wait 4 years and vote.
It’s a nice sign that the President has the Declaration of Independence in the Oval Office, though.
He could’ve posted that in 2021 and we’d know that the time for pledging lives,fortunes and sacred honor had come to this generation..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.