I often wonder if Roberts is being blackmailed.
How much was RINO W paid to nominate Roberts?
Just maybe this “crisis” is what the misguided Judicial branch needs. After all, it is apparent to most US Citizens that these judges are overreaching at best...or are insurrectionists attempting to undermine our Republic.
No one is above the law.
Davis is right.
Are you who we think you are?
Are you a US citizen?
Is there any good reason why we should not toss you out?
Where are you from?
Where are you going to go?
Questions have to get asked.
These questions can be asked via a personalized paper form provided to the alien by the USCIS. They don’t have to be asked in front of people each getting paid $75 to $200/hour.
BTTT
Any person that adopts a foreign child is likely to be a bleeding-heart liberal.
The Federalists were the ones that favored a more powerful central government.
Better questions needed to have been asked of judicial candidates.
Does Israel truly have a problem with judicial overreach?
Was having Parliament being the final judge in constitutional matters a better idea than the current UK system?
Was the PPACA levy a tax?
Would you hang a picture of Earl Warren in your office if you had to hang five pictures of past Supreme Court justices in your office?
Would you vote for Keir Starmer or Kemi Badenoch?
Does the UK have a free speech legal problem?
Who do you think should be President after me?
Do you think I was right in dismantling USAID?
Name the governor who did the best job handling Covid in 2020.
Name at least three other people I should seek to place on the Supreme Court should three more opportunities arise.
“Mike Davis urges President Trump to suspend the writ of habeas corpus to repel the “invasion” of illegal aliens”
Team Trump is simply not rounding up sufficient numbers of invaders to even justify considering suspending the writ of habeas corpus.
The legal tools Trump has are insufficient.
Trump should be able to deport undesirable aliens on any explicitly justified basis available to the alien’s government or of any visa-exempt country.
The Congress has the Article I, Section 8 power to make rules for the government.
Perhaps a new law:
Federal judges shall not make law, but merely help litigants get the benefit of the text and intended meanings of the provisions of the Constitution when they were placed into it, statutory law and the remnants of common law.
No ruling or decision by a federal district or appellate court judge on a case against a government, a governmental agency or governmental person shall be applicable beyond each private entity or private person individually listed within by name or personal particulars by the judge personally.
No federal judge who has or has possessed foreign citizenship may adjudicate an immigration, asylum or removal case.
No district court federal judge shall work on a case who has a parent, aunt, uncle, sibling, child, grandchild or known partner of such close relative or a personal partner with any case related interest.
The following district and appellate court judges are hereby barred from hearing cases where the federal government is a party or federal funding is in contention:
....
Every branch has oversight. When or how often is the Judiciary looked at by an oversight committee?