Skip to comments.
Trump’s $6 Billion NASA Funding Cut Jeopardizes Race To Moon Against China
Jalopnik ^
| RYAN ERIK KING MAY 9, 2025 12:25 PM EST Read More: https://www.jalopnik.com/1855263/trump-6-billi
| RYAN ERIK KING MAY 9, 2025 12:25 PM EST Read More: https://www.jalopnik.com/1855263/trump-6-billi
Posted on 05/09/2025 1:18:46 PM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: nickcarraway
This is old hat to the old America.
21
posted on
05/09/2025 1:45:26 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
To: nickcarraway
The headline is misleading.
Trump’s budget cuts target bloated legacy systems like SLS and Orion—not the Moon mission itself.
In fact, funding for human spaceflight is up, signaling a strategic shift toward private partners like SpaceX. Musk has already proven that commercial operations can be faster and more cost-effective. By reallocating resources through fixed-price contracts, NASA can leverage proven private-sector capabilities instead of relying on slower, costlier government-built systems.
This is a strategic reset, not a retreat.
22
posted on
05/09/2025 1:45:37 PM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
To: nickcarraway
23
posted on
05/09/2025 1:48:04 PM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
To: cgbg
That is exactly how I see it.
I like that Elon Musk is thinking of how to get to Mars, not the moon. Been there, done that.
24
posted on
05/09/2025 1:48:12 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
("A people that elect corrupt politicians are not victims...but accomplices." George Orwell)
To: nickcarraway
I thought it was shaped like a clown-head.
25
posted on
05/09/2025 1:48:43 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
("A people that elect corrupt politicians are not victims...but accomplices." George Orwell)
To: RoosterRedux
To: nickcarraway
Sending people to the moon is a waste of resources. Sending them to Mars is total insanity. There isn’t anything on Mars that’s worth the cost of sending robots, unless you look at Mars missions as welfare for engineers. But the cost of sending people to do what robots already do better is crazy
27
posted on
05/09/2025 1:49:23 PM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
To: nickcarraway
Yeah, I’m pretty sure if getting to the Moon is our national goal, today’s politicized DEI NASA is not the agency to get us there. Contract it to SpaceX.
To: Hyman Roth; nickcarraway; E. Pluribus Unum; Tell It Right; cgbg; maddog55; G Larry; Myrddin; ...
29
posted on
05/09/2025 1:56:50 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
("A people that elect corrupt politicians are not victims...but accomplices." George Orwell)
To: nickcarraway
So, Lynyrd Skynyrd never actually existed?That's a non-sequitur
30
posted on
05/09/2025 2:02:45 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: nickcarraway
“As always, Musk claimed he could do it faster and cheaper”
He always has.
Look at Dragon to Space Station, which cost just over half what Boeing was charging, and Musk delivered 4 years ago. Boeing has yet to deliver a working Starliner to and back Starliner
To: rlmorel
So, South Africa would beat the U.S.?
To: nickcarraway
If you want to fix what is wrong at NASA, start by barring Boeing from any space related contracts. Boeing is a financial “Black Hole”. Money goes in and nothing comes out.
33
posted on
05/09/2025 2:26:39 PM PDT
by
Bryan24
To: nickcarraway
Been there done that, nice try Jalopnik. Turd
34
posted on
05/09/2025 2:31:04 PM PDT
by
DAC21
To: rlmorel
35
posted on
05/09/2025 2:37:01 PM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“Diversity is our Strength” just doesn’t carry the same message as “Death from Above”)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
How dare NASA give up their “muslum outreach”!!!
36
posted on
05/09/2025 3:00:52 PM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: nickcarraway
“It’s also no secret that the government-gutting CEO detests the effort to return to the Moon and the Artemis program.”
Now, am I supposed to figure how who he is referring to? Trump? NASA CEO? Metaphorical person?
My high school English teacher would kick his ass.
37
posted on
05/09/2025 3:04:57 PM PDT
by
odawg
To: nickcarraway
Did we or did we not send people to the moon in 1969?
38
posted on
05/09/2025 3:08:54 PM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(Do the math. L+G+B+T+Q = 666)
To: nickcarraway
Elon has it covered.
Next.
39
posted on
05/09/2025 3:42:06 PM PDT
by
MotorCityBuck
(Keep the change, you are filthy animal! Re )
To: nickcarraway; rlmorel
The South Africa of Musk is now merged with Trump.
The South Africa of Mandela is now merged with the Democratic Party.
40
posted on
05/09/2025 3:48:03 PM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson