Report is she helped push sexual perversions on children...I do not care how she was fired.
Then that would be firing for cause and should have been made part of the firing record. Depending on the specifics, it may or may not be appropriate to make that charge public. Given where the debate lies today, “pushing sexual perversions on children” probably means endorsement of the BLTQZ+/-&$!# agenda. All that would be needed is a straightforward statement in the firing record that the Trump administration is standing on the traditional understanding of gender differences, refuses to bend the knee to the woke fantasy construct, and is restaffing accordingly.
Let the left fume all it wants about that. This is a debate in which Trump is engaging across the board. The public generally understands the question, and majorities support Trump’s stance. Let any protests about the firing address that squarely. Don’t create the opportunity to make the strawman charge that she was fired because she was black or female.
Define the issue; don’t let the other side define the issue. The media is not on our side. If we let the left define the issue and set the narrative at the start, the media will run with it and the lie outdistances the truth. Conservatives get caught flat footed all the time on stuff like this. Get out first. Make our framing the baseline. This is issues management 101.