Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Do You Differentiate Good Acting From Bad Acting?
Slate ^ | 2014 | Marcus Geduld

Posted on 05/04/2025 1:03:40 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

There are many ways an actor can surprise. Jack Nicholson surprises by being … surprising. Even though he’s not a chameleon like Oldman or Depp, you never know what he’s going to do next. But whatever he does, it’s grounded in psychological reality. It never seems fake. Christopher Walken, Glenn Close, Al Pacino, and many others have a surprising danger in them… you feel they might jump you or blow up at you at any time. They are ticking time bombs. And, many comedic actors (e.g., Julia Louis-Dreyfus) surprise us in all sorts of quirky, zany ways…

Some people think acting is good if they like the movie. Keanu Reeves, in my mind, is a horrible actor—it often seems as if he’s reading from cue cards rather than saying words that are his. There is a difference between playing an undemonstrative person and being a wooden actor. In fact, playing someone who is reserved is very difficult…But some people like Reeves because they think the Matrix films are cool.

Lots of people think an actor is great if they like his or her character…Or they think she’s good if she pulls off some impressive effect, such as gaining or losing a lot of weight or pretending to be handicapped… If you forced me to rank Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man versus Dustin Hoffman in Kramer vs. Kramer, I’d say he did more exciting work in the latter. In Rain Man he was able to hide behind some stunts. In Kramer vs. Kramer, he just had to be truthful.

Tom Cruise… rarely surprises me, and he doesn’t seem to dig deep into a anything raw or vulnerable inside him. He seems guarded. The must vulnerable I’ve seen him is in Eyes Wide Shut…but it’s not the norm.

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: acting; actors; arts; film; hollywood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-162 last
To: sphinx

I don’t imagine you are saying that the movie ended the way it did because of the Hays Code. I want to give Puzo and Coppola more credit than that.

True, the third in the trilogy did start out as a red-headed stepchild. Coppola had to be convinced to re-involve himself.

Nevertheless, I can’t see these successful Americans of Italian heritage ending the saga with a stamp of approval on Michael’s ghastly series of murders.


161 posted on 05/05/2025 4:37:48 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (Think about it: The Supreme Court is nine lawyers appointed for life by politicians. —David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Aw, shucks!


162 posted on 05/05/2025 4:38:58 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (Think about it: The Supreme Court is nine lawyers appointed for life by politicians. —David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-162 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson