A different view of Harvard it’s long but of interest:
The Harvard Control Grid
The Hidden Nerve Center of Global Power
https://badlands.substack.com/p/the-harvard-control-grid
*****************************************
This post is a follow-up to Wilted Ivy, which elucidated the high-level connections between academia and the Deep State. Now, we see the Control Grid. (Link to Wilted Ivy- https://badlands.substack.com/p/wilted-ivy)
Why Harvard’s Endowment Board Was Never Just Academic - It Was the Interface for Empire
The Control Interface - Harvard’s True Function
Harvard’s reputation is imploding. But what lies beneath its collapse isn’t merely bad press, or political missteps, or misguided ideology. It’s exposure.
Because Harvard was never just a university. It was a control terminal.
For decades, Harvard served as the centralized interface where capital, compliance, and globalist agenda-setting quietly merged. It was the credentialed cockpit of an invisible empire - cloaked in crimson banners and prestige, but wired into the real-world architecture of influence: endowment-backed investments, ideological pipelines, and elite boardrooms that shape the world behind the curtain.
The epicenter of this influence was the Harvard Management Company (HMC) - a legally separate investment engine with a $50+ billion war chest, shielded from public oversight and run by individuals whose ties read like a blueprint of coordinated control.
Think Blackstone. Rothschild. Rockefeller. Goldman. Davos. CFR. Trilateral Commission. Ford Foundation. Asia Society. Bilderberg.
This is not speculation. This is structure.
Harvard’s stewards weren’t merely investors. They were architects of consent. The same people who managed the endowment also advised world governments, funded foreign propaganda, sat on intelligence-adjacent foundations, and chaired elite economic forums. From their seats inside HMC, they funneled resources into the very infrastructure - financial, medical, technological, and ideological - that kept the old system intact.
The collapse we’re witnessing now - the donor flight, the resignations, the endowment sell-offs - isn’t just about public relations. It’s the systemic implosion of a command node.
The Stewards of Power - Harvard’s Endowment Board Unmasked
At the center of Harvard’s control grid lies the Harvard Management Company - a $53 billion investment engine that functioned less like an endowment and more like a high-trust global power node. But its true power wasn’t in the capital alone. It was in who controlled it.
HMC’s board wasn’t a collection of passive advisors. It was a curated group of hyper-connected insiders. Their combined influence reveals a network where elite family dynasties, high finance, foreign policy institutions, and intelligence-linked philanthropic engines operate in lockstep.
Let’s unmask the stewards…
Michael S. Chae - CFO, Blackstone | CFR | Asia Society
Blackstone isn’t just a private equity firm. It is a central lever in global real estate, pharma, infrastructure, defense, and financial tech. As CFO, Chae oversees Blackstone’s global finance arm - while simultaneously sitting on the board of Asia Society with Prince Turki al-Faisal, the former head of Saudi intelligence. He’s also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) - putting him in the policy circle that shapes U.S. foreign and economic architecture.
Timothy R. Barakett - Chair of HMC | Co-founder, Atticus Capital (with Nathaniel Rothschild)
This is the Rothschild connection. Atticus Capital was launched alongside Nathaniel Rothschild, heir to one of the oldest banking dynasties on Earth. This one move puts Barakett in direct orbit of a centuries-old financial empire with links to the Bank of England, IMF policy formation, and global mining cartels. That Barakett now chairs Harvard’s financial structure is no accident - it is inheritance.
Amy C. Falls - CIO, Northwestern University | Former CIO, Rockefeller University | Morgan Stanley MD
Falls served under David Rockefeller’s oversight while managing Rockefeller University’s portfolio. She was mentored by Morgan Stanley’s Barton Biggs - one of the original Wall Street insiders. She also sat on Harvard’s own investment committees, giving her simultaneous influence across multiple elite portfolios
Rick Slocum - CIO, Harvard Management Company | Investment Committee, Rockefeller Foundation | Chatham House Member
Slocum not only manages Harvard’s money - he also helps steward the Rockefeller Foundation’s global portfolio, placing him inside a historic philanthropic engine long tied to covert influence and population control initiatives. His Chatham House membership (UK equivalent of CFR) signals engagement with post-imperial British geopolitical networks.
Martín Escobari - Co-President, General Atlantic | Advisory Board, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies (Harvard)
Escobari’s role positions him inside Harvard’s Latin America arm - funded and named for David Rockefeller. He’s linked to Latin American business and political networks, including globalist-aligned oligarchs, major U.S. investors, and transnational donor circuits.
Drew Gilpin Faust - Former Harvard President | Board Member, Goldman Sachs
Faust was placed on Goldman’s board after her presidency, bringing Harvard’s presidential seal into direct partnership with one of the most powerful banks in the world. Goldman’s CEO at the time, Lloyd Blankfein (Harvard alum), referred to their relationship as “symbiotic.”
Paul J. Finnegan - Co-CEO, Madison Dearborn Partners | Former Harvard Treasurer
Finnegan controls massive private equity holdings across tech, infrastructure, and public utility sectors. His co-founder’s role in the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and influence in regional governance boards shows how PE capital feeds into both macroeconomic policy and institutional engineering.
Together, these figures form more than a board. They are the operating layer of a globalist architecture - plugged into Rothschild liquidity, Rockefeller soft power, Goldman market strategy, CFR/WEF ideological consensus, and intelligence-linked philanthropy.
The Shadow Scaffolding - Think Tanks, Foundations, and Covert Consensus
Harvard’s boardroom isn’t just stacked with financiers. It’s populated with consensus engineers - individuals embedded in elite organizations that shape not just markets, but minds. Through memberships, board seats, and fellowships, Harvard’s stewards participate in crafting the ideological, financial, and cultural guardrails of the Western world.
These networks don’t need secret handshakes. Their power lies in structure, repetition, and plausible deniability.
Here’s how it works:
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
The CFR isn’t just a think tank. It is the preeminent American foreign policy syndicate. Membership includes ex-presidents, CIA directors, media moguls, and multinational CEOs. Harvard elites such as Michael Chae, Larry Summers, and Glenn Hutchins are active participants - helping shape white papers and task forces that drive bipartisan U.S. foreign engagement.
World Economic Forum (WEF)
The WEF’s annual Davos meeting is where public and private power synchronize. Harvard-linked individuals such as Mohamed El-Erian, Blackstone’s Stephen Schwarzman, and Michael Chae routinely attend. Through panels, agenda-setting, and behind-the-scenes deal-making, WEF promotes a top-down vision of stakeholder capitalism - one that rebrands technocracy as “equity.”
Trilateral Commission
Founded by David Rockefeller, the Trilateral Commission unites elites from North America, Europe, and Asia. Harvard alumni and former executives like Larry Summers are longtime participants. Its policy objectives are subtle, but unmistakable: preserve global economic interdependence, manage democratic instability, and contain populist uprisings through technocratic oversight.
Asia Society
Chaired in part by Harvard-connected finance executives, the Asia Society brings together high-level corporate and diplomatic actors. Michael Chae serves on the board with Prince Turki al-Faisal, former Saudi intelligence chief. The result: Harvard’s capital handlers exchange ideas with foreign intelligence veterans, corporate strategists, and post-national development technocrats.
Rockefeller & Ford Foundations
The legacy foundations, Rockefeller and Ford, don’t just fund public health or climate science. They historically served as conduits for soft power. Ford’s Cold War-era coordination with the CIA is well-documented. Rockefeller funded early UN programs, transhumanist research, and the architecture of post-war liberal globalism. HMC insiders like Eric Doppstadt and Rick Slocum currently help manage these foundations’ assets.
Chatham House / RIIA (UK)
As a member of Chatham House, Rick Slocum brings Harvard into close alignment with British foreign policy thought. This organization is a hub for former UK defense officials, MI6-linked analysts, and European central bankers - providing intellectual justification for sanctions, regime change, and financial reengineering.
Brookings Institution, Group of Thirty, and More
Other Harvard-linked elites - including Glenn Hutchins and Mohamed El-Erian - hold seats or fellowships with Brookings, the Group of Thirty, and the Peterson Institute for International Economics. These bodies shape narratives around central banking, international development, digital currency rollouts, and the global debt system.
This is the shadow scaffolding - where Harvard’s stewards don’t just reflect elite consensus… they manufacture it.
Through white papers, fellowships, and international gatherings, they construct the Overton Window of acceptability - defining who gets funded, who gets published, and what policies get implemented across the West.
The Intelligence Architecture - Covert Finance, Soft Power, and the Enforcement Grid
What makes Harvard so strategically dangerous isn’t just its money or reputation. It’s the way it sits at the crossroads of covert influence - linking Wall Street to Langley, Davos to DARPA, and hedge funds to humanitarian fronts.
Much of this runs through its endowment structure. But the deeper ties to the defense and intelligence establishment tell us why it was targeted by White Hats.
Ford Foundation and CIA Coordination
Harvard board member Eric W. Doppstadt manages the Ford Foundation’s vast $16B endowment. That might sound innocuous, until you understand Ford’s historical role as a CIA-adjacent soft power organ.
During the Cold War, the Ford Foundation coordinated with intelligence officials to fund “pro-democracy” groups abroad, front-facing academic initiatives and propaganda outlets.
Former Ford Foundation president McGeorge Bundy was National Security Advisor to Kennedy and Johnson, and a Skull & Bones member before that. He left government to run Ford, maintaining intel continuity through the nonprofit sector.
Through Doppstadt, Harvard retains an indirect line into legacy intelligence foundations with a proven history of cultural and psychological operations.
Asia Society and Intelligence Convergence
Michael Chae’s board seat at Asia Society puts him alongside Prince Turki al-Faisal, the longtime head of Saudi Arabia’s General Intelligence Directorate. Also present: former USAID officials, diplomats, and executives linked to security and surveillance infrastructure.
Asia Society isn’t just about art and diplomacy. It’s a coordination node for soft diplomacy, where intelligence-adjacent elites can frame and disseminate regional strategy.
Harvard’s presence here isn’t decorative, it’s a signal of alliance.
.....Intelligence-to-Finance Feedback Loops
Harvard board members are often just one degree away from direct intelligence interaction:
Finnegan’s PE firm (Madison Dearborn) previously employed Gen. Wesley Clark, former NATO Supreme Commander, as a senior advisor.
Slocum, as a Rockefeller Foundation insider, interacts with UN and global health agencies - many of which share analytic data with Western intelligence.
Mohamed El-Erian, while no longer HMC, sits on the Group of Thirty and advised U.S. administrations on macroeconomic warfare - including sanctions and central banking pressure tactics.
In short, Harvard’s financial decisions are shaped by, and in turn shape, strategic statecraft. Its board overlaps with those who run the narrative and those who enforce it.
From Endowment to Enforcement
When you combine Harvard’s $50B portfolio, its Rockefeller/CFR/WEF alignment, and its proximity to intelligence circuits, a pattern emerges:
Harvard capital funds the front.
Think tanks provide the script.
Intel-linked foundations and partners handle coordination and enforcement.
This is the real machinery: a distributed enforcement grid built on respectability, funding, and ideological hegemony - with Harvard right in the middle.
.....Harvard’s control grid isn’t just about modern capital flows. It’s about the preservation of an old world order through elite continuity.
Rothschild Connections - Financial Nobility
Rockefeller Echoes - Old Money Influence, Modern Face
Shared Clubs, Generational Grooming, and Secret Society Echoes
Multi-generational Harvard families populate HMC’s board. For example, Drew Faust’s career was paved through Harvard legacy appointments before landing at Goldman Sachs.
Paul Finnegan and Barakett both hold Harvard degrees - and likely early access to elite Harvard social networks such as the Porcellian Club.
Harvard finals clubs historically produce future cabinet members, Supreme Court justices, and corporate board members - all within a tight, self-selecting circle.
This is social engineering by continuity. Alumni networks aren’t just about jobs. They’re about loyalty, soft compromise, and perpetual grooming.
.....Harvard isn’t just funding the old order. It’s mimicking it - training the next iteration of global managers, capital technocrats, and policy shapers.
The Real Purpose of the Grid
This isn’t random. Harvard serves as the social operating system of the global elite. Its function is to reproduce the class that manages perception, enforces policy, and ensures resource extraction without visible coercion.
But now, with the exposure of these dynastic overlaps - and the seizure or neutralization of their financial controllers (see: BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street) - the mask is slipping.
The American public is no longer staring up at a faceless institution. We’re looking into a mirrored cathedral - where legacy, lineage, and loyalty have insulated an invisible ruling class for centuries.
Collapse, Seizure, and Sovereign Reclamation - The End of the Ivy Grid
Harvard’s fall isn’t symbolic. It’s strategic.
It represents the collapse of a structure that once governed reality itself - through influence, through networks, through the illusion of intellectual superiority. And when Harvard’s board members started liquidating $1 billion in private equity? That wasn’t financial rebalancing. It was a fire sale from a node in a system under siege.
But this isn’t just about Harvard. It’s about the death of institutional invincibility and the beginning of public reclamation.
Strategic Collapse, or Coordinated Seizure?
What looks like financial stress - donor withdrawal, leadership scandals, asset liquidation - is the result of years of carefully deployed executive orders, legal frameworks, and exposure operations.
EO 13818 and EO 13848 weren’t abstract policy tools. They were direct authorizations to seize assets connected to global corruption and subversion.
The same legal levers that allow the government to freeze foreign kleptocrat assets can be applied to networks domestically - especially when those networks intertwine with election interference, money laundering, or trafficking.
Harvard’s endowment board is populated by individuals linked to private equity titans, global banking houses, foreign policy think tanks, and shadow governance bodies.
If you wanted to collapse a control node legally, this is where you’d strike.
The Endowment Is the Key
It’s not the faculty. Not the students. It’s the capital engine, HMC.
Once White Hats flipped BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, the funding arteries that kept Harvard’s control grid alive began to hemorrhage.
Larry Fink retreated from ESG and DEI
Harvard began scrubbing woke mandates from its investment language
Claudine Gay resigned under pressure
Alumni began defecting in public
The once-obedient financiers, previously steered by ideology, are now shifting to self-preservation mode. Their rebranding doesn’t mean remorse. It means they’re being forced to comply with a new framework.
So the question becomes: What replaces this?
Here’s the most disruptive idea of all: What if We the People acquire the very assets the global elite are trying to unload?
Trump’s America First strategy - when seen through the lens of asset recovery enabled by Executive Orders 13818 and 13848 - points to something larger:
Sovereign Wealth Funds - owned by the people - buying up distressed institutional assets
Using dividend-producing infrastructure, energy, and private equity to fund American citizens directly
Replacing DEI boards with locally accountable sovereign trustees
Imagine Harvard’s portfolio no longer in the hands of Rockefeller proxies, but reclaimed by the very people it exploited.
The Ivy Has Wilted
What was once cloaked in prestige is now exposed in decay. No amount of crimson branding or legacy endowments can mask the fact that the control grid has cracked.
From WEF’s “Great Reset” to the CFR’s foreign entanglements, from Rockefeller’s soft power programs to Rothschild’s global liquidity leverage - it all fed into a system that used Harvard as an operating terminal.
That system is no longer in control.
Final Thought - It Ends Where It Began
Harvard was never just a school. It was a switchboard.
Now, the lines are being cut. The code is being rewritten. The assets are being seized.
And the sovereign are waking up.
Because what they built with illusion, we can reclaim with truth.
