An easy AI overview begs to clarify from a modern rabbit trail:“Prior to the Constitution, the Continental Congress adopted the Articles of War, which were largely based on the British Articles of War. This marked the beginning of a distinct military justice system in the fledgling nation. The Articles of War served as the primary legal framework for governing the conduct of the Continental Army, a crucial step in establishing order and discipline within the armed forces. “
AI will not help you when you have no clue what military law is.
Your absurd claim was this:
It may very well all come back to the indisputable leverage of Military Law, which by the grace of God, defends and protects the Constitution, and which, incidentally, by the grace of God, also preceded the Constitution.
Military law does not defend the Constitution. Try reading the UCMJ, or the Manual for Courts Martial. Military law governs the behavior of members of the military.
Try Wikipedia if necessary:
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is the foundation of the system of military justice of the armed forces of the United States. The UCMJ was established by the United States Congress in accordance with their constitutional authority, per Article I Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, which provides that "The Congress shall have Power . . . to make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval forces" of the United States.History
On June 30, 1775, the Second Continental Congress established 69 Articles of War to govern the conduct of the Continental Army.
Sweet. However the “absurd” is actually Law. You haven’t found it, but are closer. Keep digging.
Few want to hand you anything, since you say nothing of what you want from this country or her president, from any one of us, or this thread.