All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.
J.R.R.Tolkien
Posted on 04/30/2025 9:00:22 PM PDT by ransomnote
. . .
You’re ok, it’s still there đ
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.
J.R.R.Tolkien
Due Process for the preborn.
They should get at least 1 full year to appeal their executions.
SpyNavy
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la RĂ©publique! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Some people think this is a Deepfake.
LOL⊠look at that trans-lesbian bearded bouncer that came in at the end of that. Is there anyone working for the Derp State that isnât a total freak show?
Shouldn’t every room be gun room ?
Okay...try this.đ
The 70’sđđđ§š:
https://twitter.com/IndianaGPA/status/1924265821427114049?t=02J1viKnG7anGiV9BpLDdg&s=19
it was late... I forgot.
Removal is not deprivation of life, liberty or property.
The U.S. Supreme Court begs to differ, but I concede they are nowhere near the authority of the justices of the Supreme Court of Free Republic.
So sorry to hear that you believe U.S. federal law is commie globalist garbage.It is, it subordinates the US Constitution to international agreements that violate it. Itâs unconstitutional.
So sorry to hear that you believe any United States federal law you disagree with is unconstitutional.
You left out the part where the treaty violates the Constitution. As the good old Constitution says, "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land...."
Fortunately, the treaty in this case was not self-executing and has zero compulsory effect beyond what federal law was adopted.
Paragraph (2) are exceptions of which no judicial review is allowed.
Paragraph 2 only lists exceptions to review of an AG determination. It has nothing to do with a judicial review of the observation of due process in reaching the determination.
But if you truly believe your brainfarts, do tell the administration or they may waste the next three and a half years litigating.
Only a brain dead liberal retard would make the argument that the founders were referring to illegal alien criminals who are invading the country when they wrote the Constitution.
Only an idiot would make believe I said any such thing. At the time the Constitution was adopted, right on through until after the 14th Amendment was adopted, there was no immigration control act. Immigration was openly solicited as there was loads of Indian territory to occupy and settlers were needed to occupy it.
Notably the Founders did not write the Constitution. The people who did that a decade or so later are called the Framers. And when they wrote the Fifth Amendment shortly after the original Constitution, they said "No person shall be ... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." They were serious people who meant what they wrote.
Such is the retarded state of discourse today.
Just thinking how sad youâre going to be when we get our country back makes me smile.
Unlike the "NATO warrior under Reagan," I was on active duty from LBJ to Reagan. I even had four years on NATO staff and know that NATO positions are all staff positions. All combat troops and tanks, war planes and ships belong to the member nations of NATO and not to NATO. A NATO "warrior" is one who gets his finger stuck between two desks coming together.
I reckon you are just smiling because you are an idiot.
U.S. Constitution, Amendment 5, âNo person shall be ... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.âDoes the question then come down to this: Is the [direct] deportation of a criminal alien the equivalent of the death penalty [life]?
Neither that, nor any other point you reference, is relevant at this stage. Procedural due process is a constitutional requirement.
https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep344590/
Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 344 U. S. 590, 597, 598 (1953).
Although it later may be established, as respondents contend, that petitioner can be expelled and deported, yet before his expulsion, he is entitled to notice of the nature of the charge and a hearing at least before an executive or administrative tribunal. Although Congress may prescribe conditions for his expulsion and deportation, not even Congress may expel him without allowing him a fair opportunity to be heard. For example, he is entitled to a fair chance to prove mistaken identity. At the present stage of the instant case, the issue is not one of exclusion, expulsion or deportation. It is one of legislative construction and of procedural due process.
https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2025/05/19/supreme-court-allows-trump-admin-to-revoke-amnesty-for-300k-venezuelans/
Wow. That will make all the difference.
The government is under order of the Supreme Court which states,
The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further notice of this Court. See 28 U.S.C. §1651(a).
A.A.R.P. et al v. Trump et al, U.S. Supreme Court, 24A1007, 4/19/2025, ORDER
That ORDER directs not to remove any member of the putative class from the United States for any reason whatever.
Are you going to tell us there are laws that say we have to feed these moochers and there is a law we have to give border jumpers shelter and clothes and a fucking cell phone too?
Is any of that shit required by any element of required due process? There is a very clear requirement for a hearing and an opportunity to be heard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
