Posted on 04/30/2025 9:00:22 PM PDT by ransomnote
Somebody is going to have to post something to counteract that awful photo.
All people have human rights. Whether that means the same rights as Americans would seem to be adjudicated as negative. Americans lose their rights overseas and must adhere to the local customs.
There is SO MUCH this government does outside the bounds of the constitution it is a daunting task at this point to reign it all in.
To: bitt
Somebody is going to have to post something to counteract that awful photo.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
did anyone notice lynn de rothchild’s interview this morning with maria?
And bail.
Makes me wonder who came up with $10,000 to bail this loser out of jail?
connections to hildabeast +
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Rothschilds, NXIVM sex cult connected to alleged child-trafficking
Rights have no rules to be followed to use them.
Everything else is a privilege.
There is no right to vote; it is a privilege.
There is no right to work; it is a privilege.
There is no right to common welfare; it is a privilege.
Privileges are promulgated by the ruling authority.
The ruling authority can rescind and and all privileges granted.
Rights?...not so much.
Prayers up at 3:15 Eastern.
Remember our country and
FRens as you pray.
Do not withhold good from those who
deserve it, when it is in your power
to act. Do not say to your neighbor,
“Come back later; I’ll give it
tomorrow” - when you now have it
with you.
Prov. 3:27-28
Well played
save place
At least she had the decency to keep her mouth closed
On March 13, 2020, the New York Times published PanCAPA - Pandemic Crisis Action Plan - Adapted. This plan was an intensified version of A National Strategy for Influenza Pandemic, originally written in 2005 by Ranjeev Venkayya and part of George Bush's planned response to a flu pandemic. The 2020 version published by the NYT became the national response for the 'Covid' pandmic (lockdowns etc.).
Debbie Lerman, and the person who wrote the forward to her book (The Deep State Goes Viral: Pandemic Planning and the Covid Coup), Jeffry Tucker of the Brownstone Institute, say that upon analysis, the article in the NYT obviously identifies the reason for the dissonance many experienced watching the pandemic response counter or ignore traditional responses to epidemics. They say the plan as published by the NYT and enacted by the Federal government was a military response to a national security threat, not a public health response. Here's an excerpt from the free sample of the book,
I would like to read the original and haven't found a government source, but Lerman uploaded an annotated version of the PanCAP-A which is available for free download here:
https://www.scribd.com/document/712534074/PanCAP-Annotated-by-Debbie-Lerman
I don't know how far I'll look into this, but so far it makes sense in that I always got the impression that Trump was constrained during the Plandemic, even in what he said.
I'm wondering if this was part of Nancy Pelosi's accusation that President Trump was dangerously 'detached from reality' during the start of the Plandemic. Perhaps, the Deep Staters in government wanted Trump to enact this national security plan, and to the point that he resisted, they claimed he was detached from reality and jeapordizing the lives of the nation. So they could threaten to remove him via Amendment 25 while panicking the public for his inaction unless he followed the advice of the National Security Council (i.e., State Department and CIA types)?
Of course, the medical regime's responses were just as bad.
In December of 2019, the National Security Council began downsizing, sending many back to the departments from whence they came, which would CIA and State Department members responsible for PanCAP-A out of the public eye along with anyone who objected to enacting it.
Aha, I just found a good article which I may post in the forum:
Government’s National Security Arm Took Charge During the Covid Response
November 3, 2022
Beauty and brains in one package.
Because rights are granted by God and not the State
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Non-citizens do not have constitutional rights. The rights enumerated in the Constitution are for citizens. There was a court case about that not many years ago regarding a non-citizen who owned a gun, and the judgement was that because he was not a citizen, he did not have the right to a firearm. He had not committed a crime or anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
