Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ProgressingAmerica
I remain well outside of your event horizon boundary.

You are trying to refocus the "originalism" argument on one of your pet peeves. I am pointing out that the problem goes way beyond the 14th amendment.

It is a departure from "originalism" that caused the 14th amendment in the first place.

Should we be surprised that this bastard child led a no good life afterward?

58 posted on 04/28/2025 1:42:47 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
"You are trying to refocus the "originalism" argument on one of your pet peeves"

Originalism as a word is short for the phrase "original intent of the authors"

The authors of the 14th amendment did not discuss gay marriage in the 1865 debates. Nor any of the other Christmas Tree items you and I commonly swap back and forth, they're all basically interchangeable.

I refocus nothing. Learn your words.

They didn't discuss gay marriage.

I have no idea why this statement causes you so much fear, but there it is.

They didn't discuss gay marriage.

59 posted on 04/28/2025 1:56:29 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot vote our way out of these problems. The only way out is to activist our way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson