The left turns everything they touch into idiocracy.
It’s past time for Donald Trump to start ignoring the judiciary. After all, that’s what the rat party does all the time.
I’m not in favor of bypassing the federal courts.
If a federal judge ignores an evidenced claim that an illegal is dangerous, then I think the federal judge should be liable in some manner for damage for a defective decision.
If the alien doesn’t want the judge to worry, the alien might buy insurance to protect the judge or post a bond.
The liability and the bond might be $10,000 each.
Congress should change the law on alien criminals. We don’t need to have alien criminals, we have too many all-American ones already. Commit an obviously criminal act and away you go, no state level conviction required.
Perhaps the (lead) plaintiff should be able to block 10 percent of the judges in a district from handling their case and the (lead) defendant should be able to block 30 percent of the judges in a district from handling their case, just like lawyers get to unquestionably block jurors in legal cases.
Junk cases should never be seen by the eyes of a judge:
Perhaps a case against the executive department with possible impact of more than one person should require the backing of a Congressional leader of the same political party as the President.
Perhaps private plaintiff environmental cases involving a federal governmental project or a state governmental project budgeted at more than $50 million should require the backing of a Congressional leader or cabinet member if the project was specifically funded by a law.
A mother can’t personally sue a hospital if it refuses your child EMTALA care and it dies.
From 1903:
THE JAPANESE IMMIGRANT CASE.
An administrative officer, when executing the provisions of a statute involving the liberty of persons, may not disregard the fundamental principles of due process of law as understood at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. Nor is it competent for any executive officer, at any time within the year limited by the statute, to arbitrarily cause an alien who has entered the country, and has become subject in all respects to its jurisdiction, and a part of its population, although illegally here, to be arrested and deported without giving such alien an opportunity, appropriate to the case, to be heard upon the questions involving his right to be and remain in the United States.
https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep189/usrep189086/usrep189086.pdf
Musk needs to find out who is controlling the Supreme Court.
BTTT
District and appellate court judges could be barred by name by federal statute from hearing cases where the federal government or a historically/currently federally funded person or entity is a party.
The Congress has Article I, Section 8 power to make rules for the government.
The judiciary did nothing.
Now they want every one of these illegals to get an individual set of hearings.
Absolutely not.
The solicitor general has already replied to SCOTUS' midnight order, pointing out that since SCOTUS is not a court of first resort and no case has yet been heard by a lower court for the petitioners, SCOTUS is acting unlawfully by agreeing to consider the cases:
If they are trying to move outside their area of responsibility and authority, yes.
George Soros has bought and paid for the remnant of anything LIKE an objective and non-biased judiciary we ever had
The Mexican government encouraged invasion of the USA.
IMO the Alien Enemies Act would allow Trump to toss out all Mexican invaders without hearings if Trump gets his way.
The courts aren’t going to let him do that.
“A country in which one administration can allow millions of unvetted illegal migrants into the country, but requires that a court vet each deportation decision in an individually adjudicated case will soon lose the values our democratic system was intended to preserve.” Yet that’s the direction District of Columbia Court Judge James Boasberg seems to be headed, and unless the Supreme Court acts to stop this nonsensical reading of the Constitution, making of it a suicide pact destroying nationhood, we will be heading into a constitutional crisis forcing the president to do his duty to protect our borders or comply voluntarily with an overreaching judiciary. (Voluntarily, because the courts lack any enforcement mechanism.)
Another possibility is to require an alien to certify under penalty of perjury that he is entitled to stay in the USA just like you have to certify your 1040.
For each possible cause for removal, the alien should have to initial in a yes or no box.
If the alien fails to check a yes box, he might be sentenced to a year in prison, including a foreign prison.
Quotes from the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees:
Article 31. - Refugees unlawfully in the country of refuge
1. The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of article 1, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.
2. The Contracting States shall not apply to the movements of such refugees restrictions other than those which are necessary and such restrictions shall only be applied until their status in the country is regularized or they obtain admission into another country. The Contracting States shall allow such refugees a reasonable period and all the necessary facilities to obtain admission into another country.
Article 32. - Expulsion
1. The Contracting States shall not expel a refugee lawfully in their territory save on grounds of national security or public order.
2. The expulsion of such a refugee shall be only in pursuance of a decision reached in accordance with due process of law. Except where compelling reasons of national security otherwise require, the refugee shall be allowed to submit evidence to clear himself, and to appeal to and be represented for the purpose before competent authority or a person or persons specially designated by the competent authority.
3. The Contracting States shall allow such a refugee a reasonable period within which to seek legal admission into another country. The Contracting States reserve the right to apply during that period such internal measures as they may deem necessary.
Article 23 - Public relief
The Contracting States shall accord to refugees lawfully staying in their territory the same treatment with respect to public relief and assistance as is accorded to their nationals.
Article 17 - Wage-earning employment
....
2. In any case, restrictive measures imposed on aliens or the employment of aliens for the protection of the national labour market shall not be applied to a refugee...who fulfils one of the following conditions:
(a) He has completed three years’ residence in the country;
....
(c) He has one or more children possessing the nationality of the country of residence.
Article 34 - Naturalization [and getting the right to vote (and buy AR-15s)]
The Contracting States shall as far as possible facilitate the assimilation and naturalization of refugees. They shall in particular make every effort to expedite naturalization proceedings and to reduce as far as possible the charges and costs of such proceedings.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-relating-status-refugees
Article 44 - Denunciation [getting out from under the Refugee Convention]
1. Any Contracting State may denounce this Convention at any time by a notification addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
2. Such denunciation shall take effect for the Contracting State concerned one year from the date upon which it is received by the Secretary-General of the United Nations....
****
What does Trump have to do to get the US out from under the Refugee Convention?
Send (or hand deliver) the Secretary-General of the United Nations Antonio Guterres a letter!
****
Dear Secretary-General of the United Nations:
I, Donald J. Trump, the President of the United States, on behalf of the United States, do denounce the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol, as permitted by Article 44.
Donald J. Trump
The Refugee Convention, the invaders’ red carpet, must be removed from the Democratic Party toolbox by invoking Article 44.
****
“Building a wall is a red herring”
“The fundamental problem is that anyone can claim asylum with zero proof, which means all of Earth can come to America.”
Elon Musk
As for asylum claimants, they should have to privately obtain say a $10,000 deposit to cover possible government costs, including those of welfare. If they get to stay after final US government review, the US government would refund the remaining amount of the deposit. Such a scheme would allow them to get the asylum claim screening the Refugee Convention requires. The hearing officers would be bondsmen. This is an Obamaphone, that’s a list of bondsmen phone numbers, and that’s a chair. You have 24 hours or we toss you back.
Catholic Charity Asylum Bonding, tell me your story.
The Hungarian tried to reenter from Ellis Island but was refused entry by the Supreme Court.
Investigate their finances and internet activity, imagine this arrogant bunch are not near as clever as they think they are.
It’s time to DISSOLVE ALL THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS