Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Brian Griffin

Way too complex and way too open to loopholes.

Basing the tariffs on the trade imbalances makes much more sense.


2 posted on 04/14/2025 3:15:44 AM PDT by sipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sipow

“excluding most raw material transactions”

That is mainly so Canada doesn’t get whacked for exporting oil to us so we can export oil from Texas and Louisiana.

Better five extra words than 30 million angry Canadians.


8 posted on 04/14/2025 1:46:19 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: sipow

The base tariff for a particular import shall be:
1. increased 2% per dollar...
on the industry wage shortfall of a key source country

2. increased by...US<->international commercial cash flow US shortfall,

3. increased by the percentage of the latest 12-month US<->the key source country commercial cash flow US shortfall

4. adjusted based on the latest 12-month US<->foreign exchange rate change

5. as directed by the President of the United States..
adjusted based on domestic producer profitability

I’m adding industrial wage shortfall[1], Presidential industry protection[5], considering trade imbalances both with the source country[3] and all foreign countries[2].

Why [4]? So countries like the UK have built-in protection against George Soros-type currency speculators.

Warplanes, tanks, ships, watches and many systems need to be able to take a licking and keep on ticking.

I’m proposing a system that is pretty much self-adjusting so the rules can be counted on for years to come.


16 posted on 04/14/2025 2:40:57 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson