There is amusing phrasing in the article, and it speaks of about 3 years ago.
. . . as fossil fuel use inevitably is inevitably reduced . . .
They’re probably actually correct, but not for the reason they think. Fossil fuel use probably will reduce in the years of coming, because it will be scarce. It will be a shock effect to the world of economics when all of a sudden the definitions of the word consumption and demand are not synonymous. There will be demand which will exceed consumption.
Owen, you are a kook.