Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cpdiii
The site at the link describes the pilot radioing the tower at Columbia County Airport saying he missed the initial approach, not the final approach, and as such should still have been at altitude and not having ATC trying to warn him about low altitude.

The news story may have it wrong and it wasn't the initial approach that he missed but the final approach, but even then he should have been at altitude, not flying into terrain.

25 posted on 04/13/2025 8:57:30 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: T.B. Yoits; All

It is just a singular “missed approach”...more info. on the flight/plane:

https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/6/81210_1596905918.jpg

https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/497772

NTSB briefing video:
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/Pages/WPR25MA128.aspx

Track:
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/n635ta#39dd75e6


26 posted on 04/13/2025 9:19:47 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: T.B. Yoits
The news story may have it wrong and it wasn't the initial approach that he missed but the final approach,

I learned something new. I didn't know there was an "initial approach" before a "final approach." I thought you just aimed for the landing strip and descended upon it. That unless you aborted for some reason, there was usually only one approach.

30 posted on 04/14/2025 1:20:59 AM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson