Another example is that the federal government cannot require state law enforcement to enforce federal laws. So the feds could not order state police to conduct searches for privately-owned guns. The flip side of that is that they also can’t order state police to conduct searches for illegals. Two sides of the same legal coin.
So the feds could not order state police to conduct searches for privately-owned guns. The flip side of that is that they also can’t order state police to conduct searches for illegals.
Yes, but the Feds just get around that by claiming someone is unstable and a risk. Then they send in the FBI and assassinate the individual. The don’t need the state.
https://apnews.com/article/utah-biden-fbi-assassination-threat-ba3cc1d3b2f6cca8bd429febdcf04219
The way to get around the ‘state’ enforcement is to employ so many FBI agents to do ‘bogus’ political investigations and then use them for whatever other pet project comes along. Same with the IRS, Homeland security, EPA, ect. ect. That’s what Obama-Biden were doing. How many new people joined the EPA, IRS, Homeland, FBI under Obama-Biden, not to mention the NGO’s that assist. You don’t need state police with that.