To: BradyLS
Right? They've observed it by satellite, helicopter, and drone. You would think that, during this time, maybe a diver or two could check out that shallow wreckage to determine if it could even possibly be part of that plane before spending all that money on an archaeological expedition.
11 posted on
04/03/2025 7:32:42 PM PDT by
MRadtke
(Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
To: MRadtke
It doesn’t look like an aircraft of that vintage to me. It may be that no one wants to waste the money to look.
12 posted on
04/03/2025 8:00:37 PM PDT by
norwaypinesavage
(Freud: projection is a defense mechanism of those struggling with inferiority complexes)
To: MRadtke
>>maybe a diver or two could check out…
Just walk & wade out to it from the beach.
14 posted on
04/03/2025 8:09:35 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: MRadtke
The theory is that over time the wreckage is covered by tidal action but then a very active typhoon uncovers part of the wreckage, but over time it is covered again.
23 posted on
04/03/2025 10:01:29 PM PDT by
higgmeister
(In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
To: MRadtke
Archaeological expeditions are just HIGH CLASS GRAVE ROBBERS getting some government money to look important, no money, no archaeological investigation, after all Professionals don't work for free, unless your working under the nose of some mucky-muck who can put in a "GOOD-WORD," on your thesis, if your kissing the right A$$.
40 posted on
04/04/2025 7:33:13 AM PDT by
Stanwood_Dave
("Testilying." Cop's lie, only while testifying, as taught in their respected Police Academy(s). )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson