Don’t now how building cities is relevant.
The post noted that the heaviest Muslim areas of Michigan and New Jersey do not have huge murder rates compared to elsewhere. I suppose proof is desired, so
Dearborn murder rate 1.06 murders per 100,000. Michigan murder rate 5.5 per 100,000. I could really stop there and note that Islam is thus proven to not disproportionately generate murders. If any evidence undercuts a theory, the theory dies.
You mentioned Paterson, NJ, with which I was not familiar.
It has a Muslim population, but it does not dominate as they do in Dearborn. You seemed to think they do, but data shows the dominant ethnicity in Paterson is Hispanic 62.5% and Blacks 24.8%. Does not leave much population for Muslims and thus the city, a dangerous city, has an overall murder rate that cannot be meaningful.
An AI search for Muslim murder rate in the US says such data is not recorded. It also said homicide victims do not have data collected for religion. There are many anecdotes that might mention such things, but it is not official data. The AI says those anecdotes as frequently mention Muslims as victims of hate crimes as they do Muslims killing people in the US. Overall, the data is not recorded so there is no nation wide profile of numbers of Muslim murderers vs other religions, or atheists.
But the Dearborn data is compelling.
There’s an article on FR from a few weeks ago, citing how they run the city of Paterson now.
Muslims building cities which are exclusively for muslims. A stepping stone to stare office, and on to Federal offices. The gradual take over of a state. Then on to the next and pretty soon they demand and get nationwide Sharia Law.
AI garbage.