The DOJ should look closely at these judges and families for corrupt influences.
“Judge blocked . . .”
This has gotten really old, really quick . . .
Whoda thunk?
Was Old Billy right, or what?
“Lookie here, only we can do lawfare, got it?”
I want to see one of these judges try to block info on the attempt at assassinating Trump.
Popcorn time that would be.
THAT JUDGE IS OUT OF HIS/HER LANE AND LOST IN EXTRA-CONSTITUTIONAL SPACE.
BAN THAT JUDGE FROM USING ALL U.S. GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS, PROPERTIES, FORMS OF COMMUNICATIONS, AND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS.
Federal judges - except for the USSC - use federal facilities and communications that are on the Executive Branch foundation.
(The USSC building, and its immediately adjacent property “to the curb” are on the Judicial Branch foundation.)
Federal judges are NOT the management of Executive Branch operations.
The Executive Branch - as a courtesy and with some deference - “respects” the LAWFUL Judicial Branch functions that occur on the Executive Branch foundation.
But the federal judges DO NOT have any Constitutional right to operate there, on the Executive Branch foundation.
NOBODY has an obligation to obey any law, any order, that is un-Constitutional.
Extra-Constitutional is also un-Constitutional.
“Legal” is not necessarily “Lawful.”
Follow the lawful; be aware of the foundations.
This is an April 1 joke, right?
Of course it is... but what legal reason does he have for (trying) to block the orders?
These lawyers colluded with a foreign spy, Steele. That alone should be grounds to deny a security clearance to anyone involved.
The House and Senate both have bills to rein in judicial overreach. It can’t happen soon enough.
EC
It’s looking like they’re distributing fill-in-the-blanks Microsoft Office templates starting with “Federal judge blocks Trump’s...”
So sick of this crap!
Why this Russia collusion business was not considered ELECTION INTERFERENCE, I don’t know. Oh, wait... it’s okay when Democrats do it. That’s right, I forgot. Sorry.
Why can’t any citizen get a security clearance? Why are these lawyers accorded such a privileged position? What about 14th amendment?
This security clearance stuff seems like a license. If so, the feds need to vet, set standards, regulate and charge applicants for the privilege.
So now judges think they are in charge of national security decisions?
Lol. FO, judge.
So when will a federal judge just declare Trump be removed and Harris and stakes as president? (Sarc)
These judges are committing TREASON by usurping Presidential powers and ruling the country like petty political hacks they are.
Trump’s mission on this is complete regardless of the injunction. Of the 1500 federal bureaucrats that have the authority to hire outside lawyers (educated guess) how many do you think will be selecting Perkins Coie or Skadden Arps?
DIRTY CORRUPT JUDGES!
Too bad, security clearances are not subject to judicial review.
Time for congress to get off their collectively lazy a** and start putting Trumps executive orders into law.