Posted on 04/01/2025 6:52:36 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
-PJ
There was a lot of tight media saying what I shared here.
Leavitt’s job is to create shade.
Operation Mockingbird is alive and well—probably called something else these days.
Hopefully Gabbard can crush it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
You do not want to be a Mockingbird.
The whole purpose of jillsbucks on this thread is to sow doubt, cross-check conservatives like Elon Musk and Karoline Leavitt, and promote the Gaslight Media line.
I’ve already seen enough to know that the Wisconsin “election” needs looking into.
I don't think you used an improper word. I'm not sure which word you think was improper.
I'm just saying that I would appreciate a little more meat to your posts if we're going to have an adult, reasoned debate.
Your generally one-line posts read, to me, like taunts. I'd prefer something a little bit more expositive.
-PJ
You know, I have the same concern over Musk’s presentations. Lots of one liners but missing the underlying substance, wouldn’t you say?
And why not?
I think I hear a Mockingbird....lets see if we can find the bird together in the forest....
“Musk”
“Musk”
“Musk”
“Musk”
Lol.
Joesbucks
Joesbucks
Joesbucks
Joesbucks
Are you sure you and the others aren’t part of an operation mockingbird?
Deflection won’t save you.
Free your mind from the Mockingbird brainwashing—and then you can begin to contribute something positive to the discussion.
What deflection? There are about a half dozen of you folks.
Show us some original research—on any topic you like—any thread you like.
I believe my insights are original and go where many freepers won’t or don’t. You’ll likely disagree, but that’s okay. To be honest, I’d be ignored if I wasn’t scratching the veneer.
When you recite leftist talking points that is hardly “original”.
Do some real analysis with real digging from sources outside the Overton Window.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window
Add to the total sum of human knowledge.
You can do this.
When you recite leftist talking points that is hardly “original”.
Do some real analysis with real digging from sources outside the Overton Window.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window
Add to the total sum of human knowledge.
You can do this.
keep up the good work.
I’m fine. You go you. I’ll do me.
He frequently stammers when he speaks, possibly because his intense focus causes him to search for the right words, or because his mind is always racing so fast that his verbalization can't keep up. One has to listen to the totality of what he says to get the full sense of his meaning.
By contrast, have you noticed that Barack Obama also stammers and stutters when speaking extemporaneously (without a teleprompter)? In Obama's case it is not related to autism, but I think they both share the same desire to be precise when they speak, and searching for exactly the right words to use can be disruptive to the listener. It takes awhile for them both to get to the point when speaking off the cuff.
What's your excuse for your minimilist style of engaging with others? Do you think I should be more concise in my responses to you, or am I okay with providing my entire train of thought in one consolidated post for others to pick out the pieces they wish to engage me on within an entire provided context?
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.