Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: miniTAX

I like what I’ve read so far about nuclear fusion tokamak technology and the race to bring it to market. It’s not in its infancy but still has a long way to go before it becomes “big energy”.


45 posted on 03/30/2025 3:55:18 AM PDT by equaviator (If 60 is the new 40 then 35 must be the new 15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: equaviator

“I like what I’ve read so far about nuclear fusion tokamak technology and the race to bring it to market.”


There is no “race” to bring fusion to market, if words still mean anything nowadays. Fusion is just a ploy used by the GangGreen to eat up public money, a distraction to keep cheap, proven and reliable energy by nuclear fission away from the market.
The technology of unlimited nuclear energy using fast neutrons such as the BN-600/BN-800 (Russia) or EBR-II (USA) exists already half a century ago and has proven to run reliably for 3 decades or more without incident. The BN-800 is even one of the commercial reactor with the lowest downtime. So if we really wanted cheap and unlimited energy, we could have it... like 50 years ago.


46 posted on 03/30/2025 4:23:07 AM PDT by miniTAX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson