1) This is not peer-reviewed, nor is it a study.
2) Any reaction to the vaccine is caused far more severely and frequently by the pathogen that the vaccine targets. Another way of saying this is that if a virus causes a particular type of event, there is an extremely low chance that the vaccine against the virus will also cause the event. This review (not study) does point out that several different viral infections are associated with pancreatitis.
3) There was no discussion of the actual incidence rate of pancreatitis following vaccination (or following Covid-19). When assessing relative risks, this kind of information is critical. They only found 64 reports to include in the review, but do not say how many they determined were actually pancreatitis occurring within a short time after receiving a vaccination. Still, if we assume that all 64 reports were temporally linked to the vaccine, we’re looking at just 64 incidents among billions who have been vaccinated. And a temporal link alone does not prove anything. In any given population, there is always a certain chance that an adverse event will happen. The pertinent question, left unanswered, is whether there is more pancreatitis among people who have recently received a vaccine as compared to those who haven’t.
4) Most of the review focused on symptoms and treatment of pancreatitis. Although they kept mentioning vaccination as a potential cause, there was no actual examination or discussion of the mechanism.
5) You still have a 1% chance of dying if you catch Covid and a fairly high chance of developing long Covid if you don’t die. The long term effects of surviving a Covid infection (regardless of whether you develop long Covid) are still unknown. So, between the 64 in several billion chance of (possibly) developing pancreatitis after vaccination, or the 1 in 100 chance of dying after catching Covid, it is clear that one option is many magnitudes of order safer than the other.
Full disclosure: I’m vaxxed!
And three more things:
1) The source of the above study is not some homeopath guru but a .gov page from the National Institutes of Health Library of Medicine.
2) It’s not saying Pancreatitis is the RULE but enough exceptions to the rule exist to warrant further investigation.
3) Most Americans are not against the fact that these vaccines exist. They’re against the fact they were blanket MANDATED .
Making this public:
Johnson & Johnson and Astrazeneca shots quietly stopped being used with the latter officially pulling its supply worldwide due to the notable, pronounced CLOT risk particularly seen in a few — but enough — young WOMEN.
These young women reacted to the mechanism of the shot, but the same risk is not as noted with mRNA shots.
However with mRNA shots: myocarditis has been more linked to young MEN who’ve had the shot, typically after second dose especially if given only a few weeks after the first - many risked myocarditis more with getting the shot than just getting Covid naturally.
When it comes to babies: vaccine non-fanatics typically do not worry about the adjusted pathogen in the vaccine — they’re worried about other ingredients like neurotoxic aluminums — it’s ridiculous that 3 shots at once are often given to infants for whom no allergies are yet known or noted. Allergens can be present in the adjuvants and additives.