Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke

Where’s the ten year long term testing that was supposed to be done?

And relabeling some experimental medical injection that has never been proven to have a track record as a vaccine after conveniently changing the definition of what a vaccine is to disguise what is being done still does not make it a true vaccine.

Additionally considering that it was admitted later that the *vaccine* neither prevented illness nor stopped its spread but weakly claimed that it allegedly helped reduce the severity of the disease, means nothing in light of all the evidence that it didn’t even do that.

But you will continue to bang that drum to at least justify to your handlers that you are earning you pay.


34 posted on 03/28/2025 1:46:31 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

Never Wrestle with a Pig. You Both Get Dirty and the Pig Likes It. Lulz


36 posted on 03/28/2025 2:12:25 PM PDT by Polynikes (Nicht geimpft Mensch 2nd Klasse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

metmom wrote: “Where’s the ten year long term testing that was supposed to be done?”

There’s no rule/law requiring ten years of testing. Why subject the public to ten years of deaths and illnesses when an effective vaccine was available. The only reason the anti-vaxxers like to beat the ten year drum was to delay the day when the vaccines would be available.

metmom wrote: “And relabeling some experimental medical injection that has never been proven to have a track record as a vaccine after conveniently changing the definition of what a vaccine is to disguise what is being done still does not make it a true vaccine.”

The vaccines are not experimental. The definition change had nothing to do with obtaining approval. That change was a matter of clarification.

metmom wrote: “Additionally considering that it was admitted later that the *vaccine* neither prevented illness nor stopped its spread but weakly claimed that it allegedly helped reduce the severity of the disease, means nothing in light of all the evidence that it didn’t even do that.”

No vaccine is 100% effective in preventing illness. The evidence is clear that the vaccines saved lives and reduced hospital stays.

metmom wrote: “But you will continue to bang that drum to at least justify to your handlers that you are earning you pay.”

So who is paying you to continually repeat the anti-vaxxer narrative? Which snakeoil salesment send you your check?


38 posted on 03/28/2025 2:47:11 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson