Yep. My most recent episode with chat GPT changing its mind was when I asked about the legitimacy nof the shroud of Turin.
It’s first response was there was much evidence against the legitimacy of the shroud.
After verbal sparring, chat GPT finally admitted the only case against the shroud was carbon dating on a section of the cloth that was repaired in the middle ages.
By the end of my debate with chat gpt, it admitted that the image on the shroud was not painted, had remnants of human blood, and was a result of high energy burst which to this day cannot be replicated by humans.
Tells a lot about this artificial intelligence craze. It can be manipulated and guided.
Agreed....
I have resigned to the fact that current Chat bots are basically a very robust search engine.