Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: V_TWIN
As a side note, if I'm not mistaken, everyone in that group text was identified by their own names. Except for Goldberg, who was only identified as JG.......

If I'm correct, it was a deliberate attempt to camouflage Goldberg.

82 posted on 03/26/2025 8:02:33 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hot Tabasco

Don’t be daft. He wasn’t a hidden chat participant. Everyone could see there was a JG in the room. Camouflage, my ass.

If nobody in the chat who saw JG in the room thought to ask in chat, “Don’t recognise that guy... Who’s JG? Please identify yourself” the question you should be asking is, why the hell didn’t they. Are they completely dim? Even a SCHOOL LEAVER joining our postroom wouldn’t be that dumb.

Where I work, we seniors actually test new hires in team meetings by getting one of us to dialing in from an unmanaged device - in Teams it automatically flags that joiner as unverified.

If they don’t challenge it, we bring it up in the meeting and they keep failing to challenge it, they get sent on a cyber security awareness course.


90 posted on 03/26/2025 8:42:04 AM PDT by MalPearce ("You see, but you do not observe" - Holmes to Watson, A Scandal in Bohemia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson