I asked ChatGpt less than a week ago to predict if the Department of Government Efficiency would be looking into the finances of the Smithsonian Institution.
It responed that it didn’t know what DOGE is and never heard of it.
I asked if it was kidding me. It wasn’t. I was shocked. Clearly rigged.
it has a cut off point I think
Grok3 said>>
Would DOGE look into it? I’d bet yes, with a 75% confidence level. Why? First, DOGE’s already poking into big federal databases and agencies like the Treasury and GSA—Smithsonian’s federal ties make it fair game. Second, Trump’s rhetoric (and Musk’s) loves hitting “wasteful” cultural or scientific spending—think DEI cuts and climate research slashes. The Smithsonian’s massive footprint (84,839 MTCO2e emissions in FY 2024, 30 LEED-certified buildings) and projects like the upcoming National Museum of the American Latino might ping their radar as “non-essential.” Third, Musk’s data-driven bent—give him access to the Smithsonian’s books, and he’d probably salivate over optimizing its 105,564 BTU/SqFt energy intensity or its $1 billion maintenance backlog (per Congress.gov testimony).
It responed [sic] that it didn’t know what DOGE is and never heard of it.
I asked if it was kidding me. It wasn’t. I was shocked. Clearly rigged."
Knowledge Cutoff Dates:
ChatGPT isn’t trained on ‘up to the minute’ events and data. It’s been improved but at one point it would know nothing of events before a year+ prior. It just lacks the current data.
Now, that’s not to say that ‘new data’ isn’t slanted towards leftist opinions, that’s another issue. I find it particularly useful to generate content on technical topics -away from the more subjective stuff.
That is actually amusing.
They keep calling it artificial intelligence but it insists on acting like it is artificial stupidity.
Maybe it is like the smart kid in the class pretending to be dumb so the “in crowd” won’t hate him.
Lol.